I am moving your input (and possibly the conversation that may follow)
to a new thread.
(Yes indeed, I agree, too, that "Semantic Search" is a good
conversation, but, given the context, your input doesn't exactly
belong to the original thread.) (02)
Thanks .. .and, Welcome to Ontolog. =ppy (03)
P.S. (for those who are unfamiliar) Please start a new
topic/conversation on a new thread with an appropriate subject line,
and use "reply" to continue on with a discussion so that they are
properly threaded in the archives.
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Pavithra <pavithra_kenjige@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am Pavithra Kenjige, I have recently joined this group. I am an
> Information technology professional, and an independent IT management
> consultant, and interested in Enterprise Architecture,
> information security, Systems Engineering related topics. I have work
> experience and education background in those areas as well ( US federal and
> I have been reading about this topic thread, and pardon me for intruding:
> But Google has recently announced support for semantic search.
> They seem to use multitude of technologies. Here are some articles on the
> technologies that google uses:
> I could give more links, but a google search would provide the same..
> Pavithra Kenjige (05)
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (06)