[Top] [All Lists]

[ontolog-forum] Incompatibilities in 3D to 4D

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Ali Hashemi <ali.hashemi+ontolog@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:23:40 -0500
Message-id: <5ab1dc970902210523s37680a93kd2d3a17e0dbb84a3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hello again,

Can someone point me to discussion / papers which outline the irreconcilable(?) differences between these two paradigms.

My (semi)naive impression is that each approach considers a set of information as a given, while another requires that it be explicated. It seems like a relatively straightforward affair to keep track of what is needed to facilitate adequate, two-way translation between each approach.

Am i missing something? Why is this such a thorn? Where do the problems arise?



(•`'·.¸(`'·.¸(•)¸.·'´)¸.·'´•) .,.,

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (01)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>