To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Ali Hashemi <ali.hashemi+ontolog@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:23:40 -0500 |
Message-id: | <5ab1dc970902210523s37680a93kd2d3a17e0dbb84a3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Hello again, Can someone point me to discussion / papers which outline the irreconcilable(?) differences between these two paradigms. My (semi)naive impression is that each approach considers a set of information as a given, while another requires that it be explicated. It seems like a relatively straightforward affair to keep track of what is needed to facilitate adequate, two-way translation between each approach.
Am i missing something? Why is this such a thorn? Where do the problems arise? Cheers, Ali
-- (•`'·.¸(`'·.¸(•)¸.·'´)¸.·'´•) .,., _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] standard ontology, Ali Hashemi |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Incompatibilities in 3D to 4D, paola . dimaio |
Previous by Thread: | [ontolog-forum] Validity of laws of predicate logic under CWA and NAF, Ankesh Khandelwal |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Incompatibilities in 3D to 4D, paola . dimaio |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |