ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] [SPAM] Last call documents for OWL 2 specificationav

To: "'[ontolog-forum] '" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Cecil O. Lynch, MD, MS" <clynch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 02:36:34 -0800
Message-id: <3B009C6977E641CCACFD8962CAEA9EDB@CECIL>
Hi Allen,    (01)

 I have been using the OWL 2 Manchester syntax in protégé 4 beta almost
exclusively and find very few gaps in general. The area of exception that is
still not dealt with in the current specification is the extension of
datatypes to capture the ISO healthcare complex data types (presumably by
external reference to an ISO or HL7 xsd). Because of the nesting of
primitive XML datatypes to form more complex data types, one is left with
modeling in OWL full. It would be nice to be able to reference external
schema definitions and leave these outside the DL reasoning but still be
able to point a dataProperty to them as Ranges.    (02)

Not having this is a huge challenge for implementations in the more complex
healthcare fields that require standards for structured vocabulary.    (03)

Cecil Lynch    (04)



-----Original Message-----
From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Ruttenberg
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 1:15 AM
To: [[ontolog-forum]]
Subject: [SPAM] [ontolog-forum] Last call documents for OWL 2
specificationavailable - review and comments solicited    (05)

Dear colleagues,    (06)

An you may know, I  co-chair the working group that is specifying the  
next version of the OWL language. Because a number of  you have had  
experience with working with (or wrestling with) OWL, I wonder if you  
would consider reviewing our "last call" documents.    (07)

http://www.w3.org/blog/SW/2008/10/10/seven_owl_2_drafts_published    (08)

I am looking for comments on all aspects of the specification, and in  
particular comments as to how understandable the specification is,  
any comments on new features, as well as any inconsistencies or errors.    (09)

Please send your comments to public-owl-comments@xxxxxx by January  
23, 2009.    (010)

If you have any questions about this process, feel free to contact me  
personally.    (011)

Thanks in advance for any efforts you put in to this, which I greatly  
appreciate.    (012)

Regards,
Alan    (013)



_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (014)



_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (015)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>