[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Axiomatic ontology

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Rob Freeman" <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 12:59:36 +0800
Message-id: <7616afbc0809122159l1e663d69va4cd3ff812a40b78@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
John,    (01)

We manage. Our models manage less well.    (02)

If we were to focus on a constant search for new generalizations among
words in our attempts at knowledge representation, I think our models
would do much better. That is much of my point.    (03)

If you find a contemporary approach to knowledge representation which
attempts this let me know.    (04)

Endless arguments over one or other generalization are getting us nowhere.    (05)

-Rob    (06)

On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:02 PM, John F. Sowa <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ...
> The bulk of the vocabulary we use (even in these email messages) is
> based on roots that were used with related meanings by our stone-age
> ancestors.  But we manage to express a lot of new generalizations
> with the old word stock.    (07)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (08)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>