No magic here, just typical abstract and concrete objects. (01)
Sean Barker wrote: (02)
> 2) The product of a design office is designs, instances of the general
> mathom "design". In the DO, any class/type structure applied to a set of
> designs is a generalization of the set of design instances - designs are
> not classes for anything. (03)
A "design" is surely an object in the world of information.
It describes something, which you portray below as concrete. (04)
> The product of a manufacturing organization is parts, each of
> which is an instance of a design. (05)
Wrong. Each "part" may be based on the "design", but their
relation is described/describes, not instance/class. (06)
regards,
Dan Corwin (07)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (08)
|