To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | "Adrian Walker" <adriandwalker@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 17 Aug 2008 19:34:45 -0400 |
Message-id: | <1e89d6a40808171634u5ad45be7r8d08d389e8d5039b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Hi Pat (Cassidy) --
Glad you could not resist the example (:-). There's actually an extended notion of closure that's often applied in situations like this. It basically says that one should not assume anything that's not explicitly stated. I believe that McCarthy (& Hayes?) formalized something like this in his/their circumscription papers. Cheers, -- Adrian Internet Business Logic A Wiki and SOA Endpoint for Executable Open Vocabulary English over SQL and RDF Online at www.reengineeringllc.com Shared use is free Adrian Walker Reengineering On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Patrick Cassidy <pat@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Semantic Web shortcomings [was Re: ANN: GoodRelations - The Web Ontology for E-Commerce], Ron Wheeler |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [ontolog-forum] Standardization Processes (Was Semantic Web shortcomings [was Re: ANN: GoodRelations - The Web Ontology for E-Commerce]), Adrian Walker |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Russell's Paradox, Updating an Open Theory, and Negation as Failure, Patrick Cassidy |
Next by Thread: | [ontolog-forum] Standardization Processes (Was Semantic Web shortcomings [was Re: ANN: GoodRelations - The Web Ontology for E-Commerce]), Adrian Walker |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |