Ron Wheeler wrote:
> I am not an expert on ontology and I personally find this discussion
> very interesting and all that but I find it hard to believe that belongs
> here. (01)
I fully agree, and I don't doubt I should have let the original
oversimplification lie. (02)
I hate to disagree with Antoinette, but the subtext is definitely in the
eye of the beholder. As one of the authors of this thread, I assure you
I intended none. Ron has correctly identified a rathole. :-) (03)
Regards to all,
-Ed (04)
--
Edward J. Barkmeyer Email: edbark@xxxxxxxx
National Institute of Standards & Technology
Manufacturing Systems Integration Division
100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8263 Tel: +1 301-975-3528
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8263 FAX: +1 301-975-4694 (05)
"The opinions expressed above do not reflect consensus of NIST,
and have not been reviewed by any Government authority." (06)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (07)
|