[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Axiomatic ontology

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Rob Freeman" <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:59:46 +0800
Message-id: <7616afbc0802101859vf6f8917m8f0cead7c6a7fccf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
John,    (01)

On Feb 11, 2008 12:29 AM, John F. Sowa <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ...The Thom-Wildgen methods, for example, are very different from
> holograms, but they also relate digital data to continuous
> mathematical methods.
> ...
> If you would like more references, I suggest:
>     http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~lblum/PAPERS/TuringMeetsNewton.pdf
>     Computing over the reals.  Where Turing meets Newton.    (02)

I don't think the term "continuous mathematical methods" captures what
is interesting about holograms at all.    (03)

But thanks for the reference. It is usually productive to mix insights
between fields, and I believe that may be especially true of these
two.    (04)

For your point about word meanings I'll start another thread.    (05)

-Rob    (06)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (07)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>