Yes - that was one of the facts I was trying to make (that Ontology does
impact Web 2.0 and vice verse). The guy told me that using UML with Web 2.0
explanations was "errant". Since I was capturing Web 2.0 patterns and
models in a template that uses UML for for static (UML CVD) and dynamic UML
Sequence diagrams), I really did not want his uninformed vote contaminating
an otherwise great presentation. I guess I overreacted as the presentation
has received over 1000 downloads and is the 3rd highest vote score for
sessions at the time I write this. (01)
http://feedback.berlin.web2expo.com/category/conference+sessions (02)
Thank you all and I am going on vacation to Tenerife for two weeks now with
my wife and kids. It is obvious to me that it is time to put the computer
down for a bit and sit on the beach and let my kids bury me in sand. (03)
;-) (04)
BTW - for those of you into Web 2.0 patterns, take a look at this then ask
if you should be buying stock in Apple: (05)
http://bp0.blogger.com/_JcWq9uCkob8/RzBswUzpRoI/AAAAAAAAAL4/T_vAoBywgqg/s160
0-h/CIMG0477.JPG (06)
The entire front row was all using Mac's including Gina (O'Reilly's event
organizer), Tim O'Reilly, Matt (CTO - Dopplr) etc etc. (07)
Duane (08)
On 11/9/07 6:07 PM, "Francis McCabe" <frankmccabe@xxxxxxx> wrote: (09)
> Duane
> I am not sure what the fuss was about.
> Are you referring to the technology stack diagrams? They do not look
> like UML to me (but then my knowledge of UML is limited).
> You have a couple of UML-like diagrams at the beginning....
>
> As a matter of fact (as Deb should know) quite a few people are
> using UML to 'do' KR. Including Elisa Kendall at SandPiper and Steven
> Cranefield in NZ.
>
> But, the real issue is really how Ontology might impact Web 2.0. I
> can speak from first hand experience that it does! We (I) have built
> an ontology representing our domain knowledge in the area of home
> improvement. We are using it on a live basis to match customers with
> service providers. That is about as Web 2.0 as it gets (including all
> the acronym soup ...)
>
> Frank
>
>
> On Nov 8, 2007, at 2:37 PM, Duane Nickull wrote:
>
>> I recently spoke at Web 2.0 conference in Berlin and made some
>> statements
>> about what folksonomy represents but tied it into ontology. One
>> person in
>> particular seemed to take exception that I used UML diagrams to
>> represent
>> that tags (folksonomy representation terms) in a pragmatc manner and
>> linked
>> to the ISO/IEC 1119 conceptual domain and he thinks UML use was
>> overkill.
>>
>> I would like to ask a favor of each of you:
>>
>> 1. Please review my slide deck from
>> http://www.slideshare.net/tag/web2expoberlin or
>> http://www.slideshare.net/adunne/web-20-design-patterns-models-and-analysis
>>
>> It is entitled Web 2.0 Design patterns, modes etc. and has a section
>> on the
>> design section.
>>
>> 2. If, and only if, you fully agree that the USE of UML was
>> appropriate,
>> please create a quick account and log in to:
>> http://feedback.berlin.web2expo.com/feedbacks/5590-web-2-0-design-patterns-m
>> odels-and-analysis
>>
>> And express this. If you like it, please vote for it too. And
>> express you
>> opinion.
>>
>> All of these slides are open source and you can take them and
>> present as
>> your own with no attribution if you like the topics.
>>
>> IMO - this is really important as ontology I more and more and
>> important
>> subject in Web 2.0. I have written about this in the book and it
>> would be a
>> share to have this link dismissed because one person thinks all we
>> need are
>> tags.
>>
>> It is also a manner in which one Web 20 person may be dismissing
>> ontology's
>> impact on Web 2.0 and may affect this roupd in the future.
>>
>> Thank you in advance.
>>
>> Duane Nickull
>> PS - please ask me if I can ever return the favour. Also - if you
>> agree
>> with the other person, please support that truth. I have not wish
>> to censor
>> or falsely share public perception.
>>
>> It would be greatly appreicated!!!!!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> **********************************************************************
>> "Speaking only for myself"
>> Blog - http://technoracle.blogspot.com
>> Community Music - http://www.mix2r.com
>> My Band - http://www.myspace.com/22ndcentury
>> Adobe MAX 2008 - http://technoracle.blogspot.com/2007/08/adobe-max-2008.html
>> **********************************************************************
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
>> Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
>> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
>> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
> (010)
--
**********************************************************************
"Speaking only for myself"
Blog - http://technoracle.blogspot.com
Community Music - http://www.mix2r.com
My Band - http://www.myspace.com/22ndcentury
Adobe MAX 2008 - http://technoracle.blogspot.com/2007/08/adobe-max-2008.html
********************************************************************** (011)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (012)
|