Gary, (01)
There are many different ways of organizing the optional modules,
and different versions are likely to be better suited to different
kinds of problems. (02)
> I was thinking of the use of modular addition, containing axioms,
> that build on sparse upper level ontologies. (03)
When stated at that level of generality, I have no objections. (04)
> In particular I was thinking of Gangemi et al's (2005) use of
> modules he calls Ontology Design Patterns (ODPs). They build ODPs
> on the general entities defined in their foundational ontology. (05)
They have a lot of good ideas. Other people also have a lot of good
ideas. I think it would be useful to compare them within a common
framework, such as Common Logic. (06)
John (07)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (08)
|