On Monday 06 August 2007 09:27, Duane Nickull wrote:
> On 8/3/07 3:25 PM, "Randall R Schulz" <rschulz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I wonder if you think of schema notations other than W3C Schema are
> > acceptable in this context? Say, RELAX-NG?
>
> Randall:
>
> Why would RELAX NG not be acceptable? It is of course the far
> superior schema format. (01)
That is my opinion, as well, but I'm not an XML expert and don't claim
to know or understand all the issues, especially for very large-scale
systems. I just know I've had some exposure to both and RELAX NG is far
more preferable to work with. It does seem tool support still favors
W3C Schema. (02)
> ;-) (03)
Randall Schulz (04)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (05)
|