[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Current Semantic Web Layer Cake

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Randall R Schulz <rschulz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 09:40:35 -0700
Message-id: <200708060940.35582.rschulz@xxxxxxxxx>
On Monday 06 August 2007 09:27, Duane Nickull wrote:
> On 8/3/07 3:25 PM, "Randall R Schulz" <rschulz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I wonder if you think of schema notations other than W3C Schema are
> > acceptable in this context? Say, RELAX-NG?
> Randall:
> Why would RELAX NG not be acceptable?  It is of course the far
> superior schema format.    (01)

That is my opinion, as well, but I'm not an XML expert and don't claim 
to know or understand all the issues, especially for very large-scale 
systems. I just know I've had some exposure to both and RELAX NG is far 
more preferable to work with. It does seem tool support still favors 
W3C Schema.    (02)

> ;-)    (03)

Randall Schulz    (04)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (05)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>