[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Current Semantic Web Layer Cake

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Randall R Schulz <rschulz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 15:25:13 -0700
Message-id: <200708031525.13990.rschulz@xxxxxxxxx>
On Friday 03 August 2007 14:27, Duane Nickull wrote:
> On 8/3/07 1:52 PM, "Obrst, Leo J." <lobrst@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > And of
> > course this approach is the same approach use by XML fans
> > everywhere. Semantics remains implicit, and so you are free to
> > interpret however you want.
> Actually, there are a few of us (old school XML-heads) who prefer to
> write XML Schemas based on a well designed data models and store the
> semantics inside a metadata facility.    (01)

In a world that seems to be filled with scruffies as far as the eye can 
see, I, too, appreciate a more disciplined approach. Though as I'm fond 
of saying, structure, procedure and formalism in proportion to the 
magnitude of the problem you're solving. Judging from the scale of the 
problems you refer to in those slides, a great deal of rigor is 
justified.    (02)

I wonder if you think of schema notations other than W3C Schema are 
acceptable in this context? Say, RELAX-NG?    (03)

Randall Schulz    (04)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (05)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>