Wacek, (01)
If I were trying to address any kind of problem in knowledge
representation, I would much rather start with an informal
terminology that is actually used by practitioners in the field
than an elegant ontology designed by a logician with no experience
in the subject matter. (02)
> I have heard complaints that overly philosophical ontologies
> are too distant from practical purposes, and make the work
> harder. (03)
I would agree. The best kind, however, are those that are
developed by practitioners who also understand logic -- but
there are very few of those. (04)
John (05)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (06)
|