>Pat Hayes wrote:
>> take a look
>>
> > http://www.ihmc.us:16080/users/phayes/context/ContextMereology.html
>
>There, you say:
>
>"the parthood relationship, which we will assume is transitive,
>asymmetric and reflexive" (01)
The property I was meaning to indicate is that
described by the axiom a3b immediately below, viz.
(a<b & b<a) implies a=b. I apologize if I used
the wrong terminology. The text is in any case
subservient to the axioms provided. (02)
Pat (03)
>Can you give an example of a relation that is both asymmetric and
>reflexive (other than the vacuously asymmetric and reflexive empty
>relation)?
>
>vQ
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
>Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
>Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
>Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (04)
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home
40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office
Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax
FL 32502 (850)291 0667 cell
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes (05)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (06)
|