nothing else, in fact; i would be surprised were it not that definition. (01)
but i am aware of the immenseness of my ignorance, and was eager to
discover that there are other definitions one may coherently use. (02)
vQ (03)
Christopher Menzel wrote:
> What did you expect?
>
> On May 28, 2007, at 12:55 AM, Waclaw Kusnierczyk wrote:
>
>> pretty standard.
>> ok.
>>
>> vQ
>>
>> Christopher Menzel wrote:
>>> On May 27, 2007, at 4:08 PM, Waclaw Kusnierczyk wrote:
>>>> this was my guess, though i was wondering whether you use a
>>>> different definition of 'asymmetric'.
>>> (if (R x y) (not (R y x))
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (04)
--
Wacek Kusnierczyk (05)
------------------------------------------------------
Department of Information and Computer Science (IDI)
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
Sem Saelandsv. 7-9
7027 Trondheim
Norway (06)
tel. 0047 73591875
fax 0047 73594466
------------------------------------------------------ (07)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (08)
|