Pat, (01)
There is an owl representation of an "ontology" online at (02)
http://merlin.fic.uni.lodz.pl/MSkulimowski/QuantumOntology/QuantumMechanics.owl (03)
I make no claims to it's validity or even the representative "strength",
but (at a quick first glance) it does appear to be a Quantum Mechanics
ontology that does not make reference to physical objects. The one
exception seems to be a reference to a field of space or subspace. (04)
Chuck (05)
>From: "Cassidy, Patrick J." <pcassidy@xxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] A "common basis"
>To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>Kathy,
> Could you provide us with an ontology that has no physical objects in
>it, just quantum-mechanical wave functions? I have to admit that my
>imagination fails me here and I can't figure out what an ontology like
>that would look like.
>
>Pat
>
>Patrick Cassidy
>CNTR-MITRE
>260 Industrial Way West
>Eatontown NJ 07724
>Eatontown: 732-578-6340
>Cell: 908-565-4053
>pcassidy@xxxxxxxxx (06)
Charles Turnitsa
Project Scientist
Virginia Modeling, Analysis & Simulation Center
Old Dominion University Research Foundation
(757) 638-6315 (voice)
cturnits@xxxxxxx (07)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (08)
|