Thank you for the input, Roy.
Talk to you Thursday, hopefully. (01)
Regards. =ppy
-- (02)
Roy Roebuck wrote Tue, 7 Mar 2006 11:36:26 -0500:
> Hi Peter:
>
> Regarding your enquiry about whether my copyrighted ontology-based enterprise
>management and enterprise architecture approach is "proprietary", the
>methodology and metaschema I am providing are available under the Creative
>Commons Attributed, Share-Alike, Non-Commercial license, meaning that it can
>be used perpetually for non-commercial purposes after free registration. See
>http://www.one-world-is.com/beam. Commercial use is available through a
>low-cost annual service provider or VAR license.
>
> The technology I'm applying to support EM/EA approach is currently a
>commercial knowledge modeling and management repository (i.e., Steve Hunter's
>Agilense product), but I could also use Protégé if I wanted to put in the
>extra effort to add in the operationally/executable-architecture, virtual
>application, general-use modeling, and graphical modeling functionality
>provided by Agilense.
>
>
> CommIT Enterprises, Inc.
> Enterprise Architecture for Enterprise Management, Security, and Knowledge
>
>
> Roy Roebuck III
> Senior Enterprise Architect
> 2231 Crystal Drive, Ste 501
> Arlingon, VA 22202
> roy.roebuck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> mobile:
> fax:
> direct:
> +1 (703)-598-2351
> +1 (703) 486-5540
> +1 (703) 486-5506
>
>
>
>
> Add me to your address book... (03)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter P. Yim [mailto:peter.yim@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 1:39 AM
> To: Denise Bedford; Conor Shankey; Jack Park; Roy Roebuck; Michael Maximilien
> Cc: Kurt Conrad; [ontolog-admin]; Duane Nickull; Rex Brooks; Bob Smith
> Subject: Follow-up on speaker invitations
>
> Hello Denise, Conor, Jack, Roy & Max (inviting MikeGenesereth and
> UIMA speakers), (along with Duane, Kurt, Rex and Bob,)
>
> I am writing to follow-up on the discussion we had during our
> Feb. 16, 2006 Ontolog conference call, during which we discussed
> the invitation of you guys to come present at Ontolog (which Kurt
> and I were supposed to follow-up offline with you all on.)
>
> [I apologize for not having done the follow-up sooner, as I had
> to make an emergency trip out-of-the-country, and after my
> return, had been consumed with the preparation work for the Upper
> Ontology Summit.]
>
> For those of you who are new to the scene, let me reiterate
> Ontolog's 'open' (open technology, open content, open standard,
> open knowledge, ...) policy. We nominally only feature speakers
> who have made valuable contribution to our field, and who are
> doing 'open' and 'original' work that are relevant to the Ontolog
> charter. The only sessions that we have agreed that we will
> feature proprietary technologies would be at the "Ontology
> Application and Implementation" Session(s) that DuaneNickull and
> KurtConrad has spearheaded. Additionally, we also make an attempt
> not to duplicate efforts with BrandNiemann and Susan Turnbull's
> Collaborative Expedition Workshop or SICoP Event speakers (at
> least, not on the same talks) given that we share our invitation
> lists and have a considerable overlap between our respective
> communities (call this the 'non-duplicative' policy).
>
> I believe Jack (on IRIS, or possibly together with AdamCheyer to
> speak on IRIS and CALO), MikeGenesereth (topic of his choice) and
> UIMA will satisfy both the 'open' and the 'non-duplicative'
> policies. I also realize that if Denise were to tell us about her
> WorldBank work with Teragram (which is a proprietary technology),
> that would need to be part of an "Application/Implementation"
> session (where the 'open' policy may be temporarily waived).
>
> I have a feeling Conor and Roy are both working with
> 'proprietary' technologies too, but I'm not sure. Could you both
> confirm this for me, please. [attn: Conor & Roy]
>
> With our two upcoming "Ontolog Content Tagging" sessions,
> possibly one "Application/Implementation" session, and one
> "health" or "emergency response" session and say, 3 invited
> speaker sessions, we'll probably put together a very exciting
> programming for the next 3 months.
>
> Let's hear back from everyone (prior to this Thursday's call as
> to which upcoming Thursdays (which you already know) won't work
> for you within the next 3 months or so (starting from 3/23
> through end June 2006.) That way, we'll have a better handle when
> we do our planning at our Thu 3/9 call. Your help here is much
> appreciated. [attn: ALL on the to: or c.c. list.]
>
> Thank you very much for the support.
>
> Best regards. =ppy
> --
>
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (04)
|