ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Tagging Ontolog content [was - Re: [ontolog-forum] ONTOLOG forum pod

To: nicolas.rouquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Peter P. Yim" <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 16:15:40 -0800
Message-id: <43E3F22C.4060201@xxxxxxxx>
 > [NR] without some funding support, I won't be able
 > to do much dogfooding.    (01)

[ppy] Nicolas, does that include co-moderating the 2 discussion 
sessions I had suggested, or is that only in reference to 
development work? (Hope it's just the latter.)    (02)

Cheers.  =ppy
--    (03)


Nicolas F Rouquette wrote Fri, 03 Feb 2006 15:17:26 -0800:
> It looks like we have a low-hanging fruit here with broad appeal.
> As far as I'm concerned, without some funding support, I won't be able 
> to do much dogfooding.
> 
> -- Nicolas.    (04)


> Peter P. Yim wrote Fri, 03 Feb 2006 12:52:57 -0800:
> 
>> > [Max] the new podcast schema (I think 2.0) which allows you
>> > to add some forms of annotations and pointers during the
>> > podcast.  So for instance you can add different images so
>> > that as the podcast plays, the image (we have none for now)
>> > that is displayed in iTunes would change.
>>
>> [ppy] re:image - the speakers' slide(s) would be a natural candidate!
>>
>> > [Max] We should brainstorm and discuss some more.
>> > Nicolas/Peter (others) any suggestions on how to proceed?
>> > I am happy to continue via email and then do some live
>> > discussion.
>>
>> [ppy] ... something more concrete: how about organizing a two-part 
>> technical discussion series,
>>
>> (a) the first session surveying the relevant technology that's "out 
>> there" now: ... topic maps, swoop, folksonomy, UIMA ... etc. 
>> (especially those for unstructured and semistructured content), and
>>
>> (b) the second session devoted to a discussion on what we want to do 
>> (with the Ontolog content), and how we could proceed ... with this 
>> possibly leading up to another Ontolog project.
>>
>> We can do (a) as early as Feb. 16 or Feb. 23, 2006, if both of you 
>> (Nicolas and Max) are willing to co-moderate (and, obviously, 
>> co-organize) it. The challenge would be: Can you pull together the 
>> real gurus for that in short order? If the answer it yes, that would 
>> be just great!
>>
>> Additional volunteers and input from everyone are welcomed.
>>
>> Cheers.  =ppy
>> --     (05)


>> Michael Maximilien wrote Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:52:33 -0800:
>>
>>>
>>>  > Max: is podcasting ontolog forum discussions sufficiently practical &
>>>  > reasonable
>>>  > in terms of resource demands to do on a systematic basis?
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>>  
>>>  > If yes, then this raises a number of interesting possibilities that
>>>  > could help us better "digest our own ontology food"
>>>
>>> You mean 'dogfooding', I like that :-)
>>>  
>>>  > For example, Nicola Guarino used the famous "red rose" example in his
>>>  > presentation of DOLCE
>>>  > (see 
>>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2006_02_02)
>>>
>>> I just added his talk to the podcast. (Just downloaded it so that I 
>>> listen to it over the week-end :-)  I had to miss most of it...)
>>>  
>>>  > Wouldn't it be great then to be able to annotate the podcast w/ a
>>>  > pointer to an example ontology built (for example)
>>>  > using Swoop from the public URL of DOLCE in a way that includes 
>>> "back"
>>>  > annotation links to the podcast
>>>  > to establish a 3-way link among
>>>
>>> Yes.  This is very interesting indeed.
>>>
>>> In that same spirit but more from a engineering point of view, I 
>>> would also point the group (I am sure you are aware of this) to the 
>>> UIMA (http://uima-framework.sourceforge.net/) work and also the new 
>>> podcast schema (I think 2.0) which allows you to add some forms of 
>>> annotations and pointers during the podcast.  So for instance you can 
>>> add different images so that as the podcast plays, the image (we have 
>>> none for now) that is displayed in iTunes would change. What you are 
>>> suggesting is a more generic version of that...  very cool.
>>>  
>>>  > Annotations need to be "first-class" things that can themselves be
>>>  > annotated.
>>>  > In this case, the above annotation is an example of the distinction
>>>  > between descriptions (3) and situations (1) in DOLCE.
>>>
>>> Yes. BTW, (you probably know this as well) but here is a pointer to a 
>>> paper by Tom Gruber on folksonomy and ontology where he begins a 
>>> model for representing tagging and essentially making them 
>>> "first-class".
>>>
>>> http://tomgruber.org/writing/ontology-of-folksonomy.htm
>>>
>>> (I believe, in addition to Peter, two or three others may have 
>>> suggested Tom's paper to me---including John Domingue when I met him 
>>> in A'dam during ICSOC last November)
>>>  
>>>  > The mindswappers have shown that doing annotations and referencing to
>>>  > subsets of ontologies is technically doable.
>>>  > One relevant question is whether the 
>>> tools/mechanisms/infrastructure to
>>>  > do it could be deployed as an on-going service for this forum.
>>>
>>> Interesting.  It's doable.  There are a variety of possibilities, 
>>> including using/creating services that allow content to be 
>>> tagged/annotated and then composing/mashing that with the Wiki.  It 
>>> might take some engineering effort but definitely doable...
>>>
>>> We should brainstorm and discuss some more.  Nicolas/Peter (others) 
>>> any suggestions on how to proceed?  I am happy to continue via email 
>>> and then do some live discussion.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> E. M. (Max) Maximilien, Ph.D.
>>> IBM Almaden Research Center
>>> San Jose, CA USA
>>> maxim@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> Homepage: http://maximilien.org    (06)


>>> ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 02/03/2006 11:15:29 AM:
>>>
>>>  > Thanks Peter for the heads-up/reminder.
>>>  >
>>>  > Max: is podcasting ontolog forum discussions sufficiently practical &
>>>  > reasonable
>>>  > in terms of resource demands to do on a systematic basis?
>>>  >
>>>  > If yes, then this raises a number of interesting possibilities that
>>>  > could help us better "digest our own ontology food"
>>>  > with related technology support (e.g., Swoop's annotation support &
>>>  > Annotea server, publicly available ontolgies
>>>  > w/ sufficiently axiomatized content adequate for reasoning 
>>> analysis --
>>>  > e.g., SUMO, DOLCE, ...)
>>>  >
>>>  > For example, Nicola Guarino used the famous "red rose" example in his
>>>  > presentation of DOLCE
>>>  > (see 
>>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2006_02_02)
>>>  >
>>>  > As Nicola emphasized at the end of his talk, small examples are 
>>> really
>>>  > important to convey
>>>  > and discuss important ideas like that of being able to precisely 
>>> capture
>>>  > the subtle differences
>>>  > on the various meanings of "red" in "red rose".
>>>  >
>>>  > Wouldn't it be great then to be able to annotate the podcast w/ a
>>>  > pointer to an example ontology built (for example)
>>>  > using Swoop from the public URL of DOLCE in a way that includes 
>>> "back"
>>>  > annotation links to the podcast
>>>  > to establish a 3-way link among
>>>  >
>>>  > (1) a subset of the example ontology that illustrates one of the
>>>  > meanings of "red"
>>>  > (2) a segment of the presentation where Nicola explains that 
>>> particular
>>>  > meaning
>>>  > (3) the description of that meaning in DOLCE
>>>  >
>>>  > Annotations need to be "first-class" things that can themselves be
>>>  > annotated.
>>>  > In this case, the above annotation is an example of the distinction
>>>  > between descriptions (3) and situations (1) in DOLCE.
>>>  >
>>>  > The mindswappers have shown that doing annotations and referencing to
>>>  > subsets of ontologies is technically doable.
>>>  > One relevant question is whether the 
>>> tools/mechanisms/infrastructure to
>>>  > do it could be deployed as an on-going service for this forum.
>>>  >
>>>  > -- Nicolas.    (07)


>>>  > Peter P. Yim wrote Wed, 01 Feb 2006 06:44:37 -0800:
>>>  >
>>>  > > Thank you very much, Max. This is great!
>>>  > >
>>>  > > See announcement at the Ontolog:WikiHomePage -
>>>  > > http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nidJMZ
>>>  > > (and the ensuing details under the "Events" section.)
>>>  > >
>>>  > > Also, please refer to our discussion at last week's call 
>>> relating to
>>>  > > this matter -
>>>  > > 
>>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2006_01_26#nidJKM
>>>  > >
>>>  > > In particular, there is continuing work to maintain/enhance the
>>>  > > podcast, and we need some volunteers (contact Max for details).
>>>  > >
>>>  > > More interestingly, an initiative that Nicolas Rouquette alluded to
>>>  > > before is now re-surfacing as a potential project for "tagging
>>>  > > multimedia and other Ontolog content for podcast & semantic 
>>> search."
>>>  > > ... let's discuss this. ... Better still, maybe we can even 
>>> devote a
>>>  > > technical discussion session for it (Nicolas and Max, you want to
>>>  > > co-organize this?)
>>>  > >
>>>  > > Thanks & regards.  =ppy
>>>  > > --    (08)


>>>  > > Michael Maximilien wrote Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:58:23 -0800:
>>>  > >
>>>  > >>
>>>  > >> Hi,
>>>  > >>
>>>  > >> 1) Podcast available on ONTOLOG forum Wiki.
>>>  > >> http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/resource/podcast/ontolog-podcast.xml
>>>  > >>
>>>  > >> 2) Modified Wiki homepage to announce --- feel free to edit, add
>>>  > >> images, or change text
>>>  > >>
>>>  > >> 3) Added all 2005 episodes -- I will gradually add more as time 
>>> permits
>>>  > >>
>>>  > >> 4) Registered podcast with iTunes and Yahoo podcast -- soon you 
>>> will
>>>  > >> be able to search and subscribe directly from these sites
>>>  > >>
>>>  > >> 5) Tried RSS feed on iTunes and Safari --- works fine
>>>  > >>
>>>  > >> 6) Removed RSS feed from my site
>>>  > >>
>>>  > >> Thanks to Peter Yim for various assistance and making this 
>>> happen.   > >> Send me and Peter any feedback or better yet respond 
>>> to this email.
>>>  > >>
>>>  > >> If you have problem using then let me know.  Take care,
>>>  > >>
>>>  > >> E. M. (Max) Maximilien, Ph.D.
>>>  > >> IBM Almaden Research Center
>>>  > >> San Jose, CA USA
>>>  > >> maxim@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>  > >> Homepage: http://maximilien.org
>>
>>
>> >  > >> ...[snip]...
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (09)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>