ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

[ontolog-forum] Re: Tagging Ontolog content

To: ed.dodds@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Peter P. Yim" <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 13:20:36 -0800
Message-id: <43E3C924.8060906@xxxxxxxx>
Wonderful resource. Thanks, Ed.    (01)

(sharing with the rest of the group here)    (02)

  ... more pointers, anyone?    (03)

=ppy
--    (04)


Ed Dodds wrote Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:07:59 -0800:
> You've probably seen this but just in case 
>http://www.technorati.com/tags/ontologies    (05)


> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Peter P. Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>
> To: [ontolog-forum] <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 2:52:57 PM
> Subject: Tagging Ontolog content [was - Re: [ontolog-forum] ONTOLOG forum 
>podcast]
> 
> 
>> [Max] the new podcast schema (I think 2.0) which allows you
>> to add some forms of annotations and pointers during the
>> podcast.  So for instance you can add different images so
>> that as the podcast plays, the image (we have none for now)
>> that is displayed in iTunes would change.
> 
> [ppy] re:image - the speakers' slide(s) would be a natural candidate!
> 
>> [Max] We should brainstorm and discuss some more.
>> Nicolas/Peter (others) any suggestions on how to proceed?
>> I am happy to continue via email and then do some live
>> discussion.
> 
> [ppy] ... something more concrete: how about organizing a 
> two-part technical discussion series,
> 
> (a) the first session surveying the relevant technology that's 
> "out there" now: ... topic maps, swoop, folksonomy, UIMA ... etc. 
> (especially those for unstructured and semistructured content), and
> 
> (b) the second session devoted to a discussion on what we want to 
> do (with the Ontolog content), and how we could proceed ... with 
> this possibly leading up to another Ontolog project.
> 
> We can do (a) as early as Feb. 16 or Feb. 23, 2006, if both of 
> you (Nicolas and Max) are willing to co-moderate (and, obviously, 
> co-organize) it. The challenge would be: Can you pull together 
> the real gurus for that in short order? If the answer it yes, 
> that would be just great!
> 
> Additional volunteers and input from everyone are welcomed.
> 
> Cheers.  =ppy
> --    (06)


> Michael Maximilien wrote Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:52:33 -0800:
>>  > Max: is podcasting ontolog forum discussions sufficiently practical &
>>  > reasonable
>>  > in terms of resource demands to do on a systematic basis?
>>
>> Yes.
>>  
>>  > If yes, then this raises a number of interesting possibilities that
>>  > could help us better "digest our own ontology food"
>>
>> You mean 'dogfooding', I like that :-)
>>  
>>  > For example, Nicola Guarino used the famous "red rose" example in his
>>  > presentation of DOLCE
>>  > (see http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2006_02_02)
>>
>> I just added his talk to the podcast.  
>>
>> (Just downloaded it so that I listen to it over the week-end :-)  I had 
>> to miss most of it...)
>>  
>>  > Wouldn't it be great then to be able to annotate the podcast w/ a
>>  > pointer to an example ontology built (for example)
>>  > using Swoop from the public URL of DOLCE in a way that includes "back"
>>  > annotation links to the podcast
>>  > to establish a 3-way link among
>>
>> Yes.  This is very interesting indeed.
>>
>> In that same spirit but more from a engineering point of view, I would 
>> also point the group (I am sure you are aware of this) to the UIMA 
>> (http://uima-framework.sourceforge.net/) work and also the new podcast 
>> schema (I think 2.0) which allows you to add some forms of annotations 
>> and pointers during the podcast.  So for instance you can add different 
>> images so that as the podcast plays, the image (we have none for now) 
>> that is displayed in iTunes would change.  
>>
>> What you are suggesting is a more generic version of that...  very cool.
>>  
>>  > Annotations need to be "first-class" things that can themselves be
>>  > annotated.
>>  > In this case, the above annotation is an example of the distinction
>>  > between descriptions (3) and situations (1) in DOLCE.
>>
>> Yes.  
>>
>> BTW, (you probably know this as well) but here is a pointer to a paper 
>> by Tom Gruber on folksonomy and ontology where he begins a model for 
>> representing tagging and essentially making them "first-class".
>>
>> http://tomgruber.org/writing/ontology-of-folksonomy.htm
>>
>> (I believe, in addition to Peter, two or three others may have suggested 
>> Tom's paper to me---including John Domingue when I met him in A'dam 
>> during ICSOC last November)
>>  
>>  > The mindswappers have shown that doing annotations and referencing to
>>  > subsets of ontologies is technically doable.
>>  > One relevant question is whether the tools/mechanisms/infrastructure to
>>  > do it could be deployed as an on-going service for this forum.
>>
>> Interesting.  It's doable.  There are a variety of possibilities, 
>> including using/creating services that allow content to be 
>> tagged/annotated and then composing/mashing that with the Wiki.  It 
>> might take some engineering effort but definitely doable...
>>
>> We should brainstorm and discuss some more.  Nicolas/Peter (others) any 
>> suggestions on how to proceed?  I am happy to continue via email and 
>> then do some live discussion.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> E. M. (Max) Maximilien, Ph.D.
>> IBM Almaden Research Center
>> San Jose, CA USA
>> maxim@xxxxxxxxxx
>> Homepage: http://maximilien.org    (07)


>> ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 02/03/2006 11:15:29 AM:
>>
>>  > Thanks Peter for the heads-up/reminder.
>>  >
>>  > Max: is podcasting ontolog forum discussions sufficiently practical &
>>  > reasonable
>>  > in terms of resource demands to do on a systematic basis?
>>  >
>>  > If yes, then this raises a number of interesting possibilities that
>>  > could help us better "digest our own ontology food"
>>  > with related technology support (e.g., Swoop's annotation support &
>>  > Annotea server, publicly available ontolgies
>>  > w/ sufficiently axiomatized content adequate for reasoning analysis --
>>  > e.g., SUMO, DOLCE, ...)
>>  >
>>  > For example, Nicola Guarino used the famous "red rose" example in his
>>  > presentation of DOLCE
>>  > (see http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2006_02_02)
>>  >
>>  > As Nicola emphasized at the end of his talk, small examples are really
>>  > important to convey
>>  > and discuss important ideas like that of being able to precisely capture
>>  > the subtle differences
>>  > on the various meanings of "red" in "red rose".
>>  >
>>  > Wouldn't it be great then to be able to annotate the podcast w/ a
>>  > pointer to an example ontology built (for example)
>>  > using Swoop from the public URL of DOLCE in a way that includes "back"
>>  > annotation links to the podcast
>>  > to establish a 3-way link among
>>  >
>>  > (1) a subset of the example ontology that illustrates one of the
>>  > meanings of "red"
>>  > (2) a segment of the presentation where Nicola explains that particular
>>  > meaning
>>  > (3) the description of that meaning in DOLCE
>>  >
>>  > Annotations need to be "first-class" things that can themselves be
>>  > annotated.
>>  > In this case, the above annotation is an example of the distinction
>>  > between descriptions (3) and situations (1) in DOLCE.
>>  >
>>  > The mindswappers have shown that doing annotations and referencing to
>>  > subsets of ontologies is technically doable.
>>  > One relevant question is whether the tools/mechanisms/infrastructure to
>>  > do it could be deployed as an on-going service for this forum.
>>  >
>>  > -- Nicolas.    (08)


>>  > Peter P. Yim wrote Wed, 01 Feb 2006 06:44:37 -0800:
>>  >
>>  > > Thank you very much, Max. This is great!
>>  > >
>>  > > See announcement at the Ontolog:WikiHomePage -
>>  > > http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nidJMZ
>>  > > (and the ensuing details under the "Events" section.)
>>  > >
>>  > > Also, please refer to our discussion at last week's call relating to
>>  > > this matter -
>>  > > 
>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2006_01_26#nidJKM
>>  > >
>>  > > In particular, there is continuing work to maintain/enhance the
>>  > > podcast, and we need some volunteers (contact Max for details).
>>  > >
>>  > > More interestingly, an initiative that Nicolas Rouquette alluded to
>>  > > before is now re-surfacing as a potential project for "tagging
>>  > > multimedia and other Ontolog content for podcast & semantic search."
>>  > > ... let's discuss this. ... Better still, maybe we can even devote a
>>  > > technical discussion session for it (Nicolas and Max, you want to
>>  > > co-organize this?)
>>  > >
>>  > > Thanks & regards.  =ppy
>>  > > --    (09)


>>  > > Michael Maximilien wrote Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:58:23 -0800:
>>  > >
>>  > >>
>>  > >> Hi,
>>  > >>
>>  > >> 1) Podcast available on ONTOLOG forum Wiki.
>>  > >> http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/resource/podcast/ontolog-podcast.xml
>>  > >>
>>  > >> 2) Modified Wiki homepage to announce --- feel free to edit, add
>>  > >> images, or change text
>>  > >>
>>  > >> 3) Added all 2005 episodes -- I will gradually add more as time 
>> permits
>>  > >>
>>  > >> 4) Registered podcast with iTunes and Yahoo podcast -- soon you will
>>  > >> be able to search and subscribe directly from these sites
>>  > >>
>>  > >> 5) Tried RSS feed on iTunes and Safari --- works fine
>>  > >>
>>  > >> 6) Removed RSS feed from my site
>>  > >>
>>  > >> Thanks to Peter Yim for various assistance and making this happen.  
>>  > >> Send me and Peter any feedback or better yet respond to this email.
>>  > >>
>>  > >> If you have problem using then let me know.  Take care,
>>  > >>
>>  > >> E. M. (Max) Maximilien, Ph.D.
>>  > >> IBM Almaden Research Center
>>  > >> San Jose, CA USA
>>  > >> maxim@xxxxxxxxxx
>>  > >> Homepage: http://maximilien.org
> 
>>  > >> ...[snip]...
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (010)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [ontolog-forum] Re: Tagging Ontolog content, Peter P. Yim <=