[Top] [All Lists]

[health-ont] Health Ontology Mapping - Project Kick-off [was - Re: Need

To: Bob Smith <robsmith5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'[health-ont] '" <health-ont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Peter P. Yim" <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:45:24 -0800
Message-id: <41FAA464.8000703@xxxxxxxx>
Good suggestions, Bob.    (01)

1. I have starting a wiki page for this potential pilot project. See: 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?HealthOntologyMapping    (02)

2. As for the meeting, I have set up the call for Tue 2005.02.01 10:30am 
PST / 1:30pm EST. See: 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?HealthOntologyMapping/ConferenceCall_2005_02_01    (03)

Anyone interested to participate and contribute (or observe) are welcomed.    (04)

RSVP. Sign yourselves up on the wiki pages mentioned above.    (05)

Regards.  -ppy
--    (06)

Bob Smith wrote Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:01:04 -0800:
> Hello Peter,
> Thanks for the alert about "some concrete work".
> Extending that metaphor, construction projects, if they are to have a good
> chance of success, begins with a proposal design phase where the primary
> project objectives, expected results, roles and relationships are discussed
> until convergence is cemented sufficiently.
> Two suggestions: 1) can you setup a Phase Two Project Planning page, and 
>                  2) can you arrange a scheduled conference call
> It is possible and feasible to hold a phone conference call on Monday or
> Tuesday of next week, and to begin thinking about a project agenda page on
> which those interested can post key questions, possible ambiguities,
> statements of interests and capabilities, etc.?
> Thanks
> Bob    (07)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: health-ont-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:health-ont-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter P. Yim
> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 6:57 PM
> To: health-ont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [health-ont] Re: Need Help with Health Domains Ontology (Followup
> onRFI)
> I should have moved the discussion to this ([health-ont]) forum. Missed 
> that myself, earlier.
> Therefore, attention NHIN-RFI team members ... some concrete work is 
> coming up.  If you plan to participate, but are running into short term 
> availability issues, please post here so that Bob, Brand, Mark and I (or 
> whoever is going to be coordinating the specific upcoming tasks) could 
> plan and schedule things optimally.
> Regards,
> --    (08)

> Peter P. Yim wrote Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:55:55 -0800:
>>Thank you for making the concrete (and actionable) suggestions to 
>>FHA-ONCHIT. This is wonderful!
>> > ... hope we can discuss this in either today's meeting ... or in
>> > a separate conference call soon.
>>Brand, we already have a planned "invited speaker" session today. Maybe 
>>we can make this discussion the key agenda item for next week's call 
>>(i.e. the 2005.02.03 ontolog call that starts 1:30pm EST / 10:30am PST), 
>>if that is OK with you. If you prefer that even sooner (or have a 
>>conflict), please suggest one or two time slots that would work for you.
>>That said, since we have Conrad Bock from NIST speaking today, and 
>>Conrad has been NIST's representative on the HL7 Clinical Decision 
>>Support Technical Committee, we would likely touch upon some 
>>health-related discussion anyway. (However, that might not happen until 
>>the "open discussion" segment of the session, which probably would be 
>>after 2:15pm your time. Unfortunate!)
>>More specifically, since your suggested examples will be in SUMO, I'd 
>>like to find out about Adam Pease's availability too [attn: Adam: please 
>>advise, as I remember you saying that you may not be available for a few 
>>weeks at our last call.]
>>--     (09)

>>Brand Niemann wrote Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:50:17 -0500:
>>>I attended the Federal Health Architecture-ONCHIT Meeting on Health 
>>>Domains yesterday (see attached background presentaton and 
>>>spreadsheet) and made the following suggestions for moving forward 
>>>jointly (Ontolog/SICoP) and in the context of the RFI (for which they 
>>>have about 500 responses) as follows:
>>>(1) show how their 5 basic domains and examples under each can be 
>>>mapped to say SUMO-WordNet; and
>>>(2) how some examples of domain ontologies mentioned in the RFI 
>>>would/or would not map well to (1) above.
>>>They really liked this suggestion (maybe I could have worded it 
>>>better), but this would show how you could help them and set the stage 
>>>for a presentation to them soon if you are agreeable.
>>>I am sure that you could offer significant improvements to their 
>>>Health Domains structure - e.g., it looks like it might more logically 
>>>all fall under say Health Care with subclasses like Access, 
>>>Information, Administration, Services, Research, Education, etc., but 
>>>your are the experts at this, not me, and also need to be compatible 
>>>with the health domain ontologies that are already out there that 
>>>would fall under this upper domain.
>>>I hope we can discuss this in either today's meeting (I have to break 
>>>off about 2:15 for another meeting) or in a separate conference call 
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/health-ont/
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/health-ont/NHIN-RFI/
To  Post: mailto:health-ont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?NhinRfi    (010)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [health-ont] Health Ontology Mapping - Project Kick-off [was - Re: Need Helpwith Health Domains Ontology (Followup on RFI)], Peter P. Yim <=