FYI ... (from the UBL TC who is now having their face-to-face meeting
in the Washington, DC area.) -ppy (01)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [ubl] Agreed to schema modularity model
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:01:38 -0500
From: CRAWFORD, Mark <MCRAWFORD@xxxxxxx>
To: CRAWFORD, Mark <MCRAWFORD@xxxxxxx>, Ubl List (E-mail)
<ubl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (02)
disregard previous - one slight change to better align with LC
(changing control schema to document schema). (03)
Mark (04)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CRAWFORD, Mark [mailto:MCRAWFORD@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 1:46 PM
> To: Ubl List (E-mail)
> Subject: [ubl] Agreed to schema modularity model
>
>
> Folks,
>
> The attached was just agreed to by the TC members present at
> the current F2F.
>
> Mark
> <<figure 3-2.vsd>>
> (05)
Visio-figure 3-2.pdf
Description: Binary data
figure 3-2.vsd
Description: Binary data
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01)
|