To: | "'ontolog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <ontolog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | "Miller, Robert (GXS)" <Robert.Miller@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:17:36 -0500 |
Message-id: | <3D808EC801AED111B0100008C75D5DDC15B725C0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Mike,
Yes, the code
list value is an 'index into a code set', and yes, the burden for understanding
the semantics of a code lies with the code set, and not with an individual
code. X12, UN/CEFACT, and UBL all recognize the need to clearly identify
the code set and code set owner. Unfortunately, these existing code
sets do not lead to an ontology that explains the semantics behind the
codes.
Cheers,
Bob
---------------------------------------------------- Michael C. Daconta Director, Web & Technology Services www.mcbrad.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog] UBL proposals for codesets?, Leo Obrst |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog] UBL proposals for codesets?, MDaconta |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog] UBL proposals for codesets?, Leo Obrst |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog] UBL proposals for codesets?, MDaconta |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |