Kurt, would you be back by 3:30pm (PDT)? (01)
Leo, would 6:30pm EDT work for you too? (02)
If the answers are "yes" to both of the above questions, maybe we should do it
at WED 8.07.02 - 6:30 pm EDT/3:30 pm PDT instead. (03)
Await your responses to see if we could/should revise the time. The lack of a
confirmed change will mean that we continue to have our telecon tomorrow at 6
pm EDT/3 pm PDT. (04)
-ppy
-- (05)
Kurt Conrad wrote Tue, 06 Aug 2002 22:08:17 -0700: (06)
> Peter,
>
> That should work fine for me. I might be in the car coming back from
> San Francisco, but that shouldn't be a hinderance (aside from a
> little noise).
>
> /s/ kwc 2002.08.06 22:08
>
> At 2002-08-06 12:38 -0700, Peter P. Yim wrote:
> >Thank you for the message, Leo.
> >
> >I'm fine with WED 8.07.02 - 6 pm EDT/3 pm PDT, what about you, Kurt?
> >
> >I can initiate the call, and conference both of you in.
> >Leo, assuming it's tomorrow, should I be calling the 540 number?
> >
> >-ppy
> >--
> >
> >Leo Obrst wrote Tue, 06 Aug 2002 15:21:17 -0400:
> >
> > > Peter, Kurt,
> > >
> > > Sorry for today: what a day! Phones out, satellite down, dental
> > appt which turned into
> > > a tooth extraction. So can't really talk today. I have a meeting
> > 9:30-12 Thurs, but
> > > might be able to talk later Thurs or even tomorrow WED late, say
> > 6 pm EDT/3 pm PDT.
> > > The latter might be best.
> > >
> > > Leo
> > >
> > > "Peter P. Yim" wrote Tue, 06 Aug 2002 11:38:32 -0700:
> > >
> > > > Leo / Kurt,
> > > >
> > > > Due to a variety of mishaps, looks like we'd better reschedule
> > this for the coming
> > > > Thursday (8/8/02).
> > > >
> > > > Leo, can you do it, like, late morning (say 11:00am or 12:00
> > noon) or even early
> > > > afternoon your time Thursday?
> > > > Please advise your preference, and also which number (540 or
> > 703) should I call
> > > > you at.
> > > >
> > > > I jotted down some thoughts on what we could be discussing.
> > Here's the draft --
> > > >
> > http://ontolog.cim3.org/team/meetings/ontolog_teleconf_020806a.html
> > > >
> > > > Other things you guys need to talk about are welcomed (if you
> > have the time to
> > > > list them in your reply; if not, don't worry.)
> > > >
> > > > I shall look forward to our Thursday conversation.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > PPY
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > "Peter P. Yim" wrote Mon, 05 Aug 2002 12:43:28 -0700:
> > > >
> > > > > Leo / Kurt,
> > > > >
> > > > > At least we have one possibility, albeit a less than ideal
> > one. I am available
> > > > > tomorrow (Tue 8.6.02) from 6:00am until 5:30pm PDT. Leo, can
> > you make it (for
> > > > > a 20-30 minute phone conference) some time later in the day?
> > > > >
> > > > > Look forward to our conference tomorrow.
> > > > >
> > > > > -ppy
> > > > > --
> > > >
> > > > ===
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Kurt Conrad wrote Mon, 05 Aug 2002 12:09:56 -0700:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Folks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I fear that I should point out that I'm on summer hours and 6:00
> > > > > > seems quite early. I can make myself available, but I'm
> > not sure
> > > > > > about my brain.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm free all day today and tomorrow (Tuesday).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /s/ kwc 2002.08.05 12:09
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ===
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > At 2002-08-05 14:39 -0400, Leo Obrst wrote:
> > > > > > >9 am EDT/6 am PDT is good for me. I have a dental appt at
> > 10:30, so must
> > > > > > >leave around 10 am EDT. Might have time Thurs am too.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Thanks,
> > > > > > >Leo
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >"Peter P. Yim" wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thank you, Kurt. I was out all day yesterday, and therefore,
> > > > > > > didn't get a
> > > > > > > > chance to respond to you until now. Looks like we're
> > ready to get
> > > > > > > started
> > > > > > > > again.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The previous discussion archives have all been moved
> > over now.
> > > > > > > > Coincidentally, we are getting a clean start in August
> > 2002 --
> > > > > > > with all
> > > > > > > > previous discussions being in the May 2002 through July 2002
> > > > > > > archives. Some
> > > > > > > > time later today, I will go in the remove all these
> > test messages and
> > > > > > > > responses, and we'll be ready to roll.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Leo and Kurt,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Could we do a three-way phone conversation early next
> > week to
> > > > > > > talk about
> > > > > > > > immediate next steps? I can do that Monday afternoon
> > (CA time) or
> > > > > > > Tuesday
> > > > > > > > anytime (as early as 6:00am PDT). What would be a good
> > time for
> > > > > > > you guys?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > (fyi ... Leo works out of the East coast, and Kurt is
> > in the San
> > > > > > > Francisco
> > > > > > > > Bay Area.)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -ppy
> > > > > > > > 650-578-9998
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > P.S. Don't mean to leave you out, but I just didn't want to
> > > > > > > further burden
> > > > > > > > you with the startup details. We'll keep you posted via
> > the list.
> > > > > > > > P.P.S. Eugene has indicated that he'll remain an
> > "observer" for now.
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Peter,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Message received.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > /s/ kwc 2002.08.02 09:05
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ==
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > At 2002-08-02 01:50 -0700, Peter P. Yim wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >Hi Kurt, Leo, Mike & Eugene,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >The CIM3 systems work had taken a little longer than
> > I had
> > > > > > > expected,
> > > > > > > > > >but things are returning to normal
> > > > > > > > > >now, with a more robust system at our disposition.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >This is a test to make sure the new list is working
> > properly -- and
> > > > > > > > > >as such, I am only routing this test
> > > > > > > > > >message to Kurt Conrad, Leo Obrst, Mike Adcock and
> > Eugene Kim (my
> > > > > > > > > >partner in a new startup -- I'll explain
> > > > > > > > > >this more fully next time I have a chance.)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >Please acknowledge receipt of this test message --
> > and advise
> > > > > > > if you
> > > > > > > > > >do notice any anomaly.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >I have yet to transfer the old [ubl-ontolog]
> > discussions over
> > > > > > > to the
> > > > > > > > > >new forum archives.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >I'm looking forward to all your help to get this
> > forum going
> > > > > > > real soon.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >Personal regards,
> > > > > > > > > >PPY
> > > > > > > > > >--
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >"Peter P. Yim" wrote Tue, 16 Jul 2002 15:09:09 -0700:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hello Everybody,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Just writing to let everyone know that the CIM3
> > system is going
> > > > > > > > > > through some network upgrade, which did
> > > > > > > > > > > not go as smoothly as I had hoped to see.
> > Therefore, rather than
> > > > > > > > > > bringing up the new [ontolog] forum,
> > > > > > > > > > > and have it be intermittent while service is
> > being rendered
> > > > > > > by my
> > > > > > > > > > network provider, I've decided to
> > > > > > > > > > > bring it up after the upgrade is fully in place. That,
> > > > > > > hopefully,
> > > > > > > > > > should only be another week or so.
> > > > > > > > > > > Please bear with me. I'll keep everyone posted on
> > the status.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > PPY
> >
> >--
> >An archive of the [ontolog] forum can be found
> >at http://www.cim3.net/lists/ontolog/
>
> ___________________________________________________________________
> Kurt Conrad
> 2994 Salem Dr. 408-247-0454
> Santa Clara, CA 95051-5502 408-247-0457 (data/fax)
> http://www.SagebrushGroup.com mailto:conrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> --
> An archive of the [ontolog] forum can be found
> at http://www.cim3.net/lists/ontolog/ (07)
--
An archive of the [ontolog] forum can be found
at http://www.cim3.net/lists/ontolog/ (08)
|