Dear Peter, (01)
My vote is asynchronous by e-mail. (02)
Regards (03)
Matthew (04)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ontolog-admin-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:ontolog-admin-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Peter Yim
> Sent: 15 December 2006 19:08
> To: [ontolog-admin] forum
> Subject: Re: [ontolog-admin] Scheduling Events for Q1- & Q2-2007
>
>
> Dear Matthew,
>
> Following up on yesterday's conversation ...
>
> 1. the fact that we had (at the 2006.12.07 call) cancelled the call
> for 2006.12.28, and that we have scheduled events for 12/21, 1/4, 1/11
> & 1/18 ...
>
> 2. that means our earliest operational planning and review session
> call will have to be 2007.01.25 if we want to stick with the regular
> Thursday time slot.
>
> 3. As such, we had better consider:
>
> (a) do it asynchronously over the e-mail forum,
>
> (b) pick another (sooner) non-Thursday date/time for a
> planning call, or even
>
> (c) resuscitate the Thu 2006.12.28 date, and start finding out if we
> can pull in enough of the party concerned to do it at that slot.
>
> ... your call.
>
> Regards. =ppy
> --
>
>
> On 12/14/06, Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Dear Matthew,
> >
> > Planning meetings ... That happens every Thursday 10:30am
> PST when we
> > don't have a scheduled event (talks or panel discussions), unless it
> > is specifically cancelled.
> >
> > I need to get ready for today's talk now ...
> >
> > Cheers. =ppy
> > --
>
>
> > On 12/14/06, matthew.west@xxxxxxxxx <matthew.west@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Dear Peter,
> > >
> > > When are you planning to have the ordinary planning
> meetings (what were we
> > > going to call them - operational something or other)?
> > >
> > > PS not much chance of me doing any planning between now
> and Christmas.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Matthew
>
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: peter.yim@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:peter.yim@xxxxxxxxx]On
> Behalf Of Peter Yim
> > > Sent: 14 December 2006 15:28
> > > To: West, Matthew R SIPC-DFC/D21; ray@xxxxxxxx
> > > Cc: [ontolog-admin] forum
> > > Subject: Re: Scheduling Events for Q1- & Q2-2007
> > >
> > > Wonderful! ... Thank you, Steve and Matthew, for the
> prompt responses.
> > >
> > > Here goes: Matthew takes H1 (weeks 1 or 2 of each month)
> for the "Database &
> > > Ontology" mini-series activities, and Steve takes H2
> (weeks 3 or 4 of each
> > > month) for the "Ontology Measurement & Evaluation"
> mini-series activities.
> > > ... Feel free to explore swapping dates if either of you
> run into a bind in
> > > a particular month.
> > >
> > > I hope we could have event plans for Q1 and hopefully Q2
> also worked out
> > > before the end of Dec-2006, if at all possible. At the
> least, please get
> > > dates locked in ... allowing the rest of us to plan other
> activities around
> > > them.
> > >
> > > Let's keep talking. =ppy
> > > --
>
>
> > > On 12/14/06, matthew.west@xxxxxxxxx <
> matthew.west@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Dear Peter,
> > > >
> > > > Good idea. I'll take H1 (but I'm not bothered).
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Matthew
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Steve Ray wrote Dec 13, 2006 9:05 AM EST:
> > > > I'm willing to try it. I have no particular preference
> at this point.
> > > > Since our Interoperability Week is in late April, that might
> > > > affect the April schedule.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: peter.yim@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:peter.yim@xxxxxxxxx]On
> > > > > Behalf Of Peter
> > > > > Yim
> > > > > Sent: 13 December 2006 05:58
> > > > > To: West, Matthew R SIPC-DFC/D21; Steve Ray
> > > > > Cc: Leo Obrst; Kurt Conrad
> > > > > Subject: Scheduling Events for Q1- & Q2-2007
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Dear Matthew & Steve,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you very much for having tied down the Jan-2007
> event for each
> > > > > of your mini-series'.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now that we are about to plan out events for Feb-2007
> and onwards, I
> > > > > have a suggestion ...
> > > > >
> > > > > If we break up a month into two halves (H1=first 2
> weeks and H2=weeks
> > > > > 3&4). And, if one of you will take up H1 and the
> other H2, then we can
> > > > > independently schedule the two mini-series' without
> worrying too much
> > > > > about scheduling conflict (the two of you can swap
> dates too, if need
> > > > > be). Also, community members who cares to track one
> mini-series only
> > > > > would consistently have events coming up roughly once a month.
> > > > >
> > > > > Question:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Do you like the idea?
> > > > >
> > > > > 2. Do you have a preference as to taking up H1 or H2?
> > > > >
> > > > > Please advise your thoughts.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards. =ppy
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > To Post: mailto:ontolog-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Message Archives:
> > > http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-admin/
> > > Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> > > Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> > > Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> _________________________________________________________________
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-admin/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/
>
> (05)
_________________________________________________________________
To Post: mailto:ontolog-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-admin/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (06)
|