Thanks, Kurt. Personally, I like "operational planning and review sessions." (01)
More input? Comments? ... otherwise, let's use that instead. =ppy
-- (02)
On 12/7/06, Kurt Conrad <conrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Peter,
>
> The critical importance of this topic drove me into my
> thesaurus. The most accurate word seems to be "recurrent", but I
> think that it's kind of dumb.
>
> How about "operational planning and review sessions" or "project
> planning and review sessions" to distinguish from the more long-term
> strategic planning sessions, which are held far less frequently?
>
> /s/ kwc 2006.12.07 22:40
>
>
> At 2006-12-07 15:28, you wrote:
>
> >All,
> >
> > > [Kurt] I don't really like the word "periodic" but
> > > they are not regularly scheduled and are fit in as
> > > time is available.
> >
> >[ppy] How about "standing" ... I think "standing review
> >and planning sessions" sound good too.
> >
> >Like that? Comments?
> >
> >Regards. =ppy
> >--
> >
> >
> >Peter Yim wrote Thu, 7 Dec 2006 11:47:33 -0800:
> > > Thank you, Kurt ... Sounds great!
> > >
> > > I'll start using "periodic planning and review sessions" for the
> > > non-event type sync-up calls from here on (unless we start
> > getting more
> > > input, and the consensus ends up elsewhere).
> > >
> > > Thanks & regards. =ppy
> > > --
> >
> >
> > > On 12/7/06, *Kurt Conrad* <conrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > <mailto:conrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Peter,
> > >
> > > The phrase "regular weekly conference call" is breaking down,
> > given
> > > the increasing number of events. Would it make sense to
> > refer to the
> > > calls like we had today as something like "periodic planning and
> > > review sessions". I don't really like the word "periodic"
> > but they
> > > are not regularly scheduled and are fit in as time is available.
> > >
> > > This would also allow us to show the next planning session on our
> > > schedule, to reinforce the topics which need to be addressed
> > in the
> > > current session.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > /s/ kwc 2006.12.07 11:40
> >
> >
> > > At 2006-12-07 08:43, you wrote:
> > > >1. We don't have an event today, but the regular weekly
> > > >conference call for active members will still be on. We
> > > >won't have a heavy agenda today (as some of those who
> > > >would usually show up are traveling), and the call will
> > > >probably be less than 1 hour. Besides the usual
> > > >sync-up, we could spend some time on looking back at
> > > >2006, and discussion on what else would be interesting
> > > >to do in 2007. I would also encourage new members to
> > > >join us at the call, just to say 'hello' and to get a
> > > >feel for the 'virtual meeting' setting. Please refer to
> > > >details at:
> > >
> > >
> > ___________________________________________________________________
> > > Kurt Conrad
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >To Post: mailto:ontolog-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-admin/
> >Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> >Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> >Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/
>
> ___________________________________________________________________
> Kurt Conrad
> 588 Bancroft St.
> Santa Clara, CA 95051-5612
> (408) 247-0454
> mailto:conrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> www.SagebrushGroup.com
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-admin/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/
>
_________________________________________________________________
To Post: mailto:ontolog-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-admin/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (03)
|