Peter, (01)
The critical importance of this topic drove me into my
thesaurus. The most accurate word seems to be "recurrent", but I
think that it's kind of dumb. (02)
How about "operational planning and review sessions" or "project
planning and review sessions" to distinguish from the more long-term
strategic planning sessions, which are held far less frequently? (03)
/s/ kwc 2006.12.07 22:40 (04)
At 2006-12-07 15:28, you wrote: (05)
>All,
>
> > [Kurt] I don't really like the word "periodic" but
> > they are not regularly scheduled and are fit in as
> > time is available.
>
>[ppy] How about "standing" ... I think "standing review
>and planning sessions" sound good too.
>
>Like that? Comments?
>
>Regards. =ppy
>--
>
>
>Peter Yim wrote Thu, 7 Dec 2006 11:47:33 -0800:
> > Thank you, Kurt ... Sounds great!
> >
> > I'll start using "periodic planning and review sessions" for the
> > non-event type sync-up calls from here on (unless we start
> getting more
> > input, and the consensus ends up elsewhere).
> >
> > Thanks & regards. =ppy
> > --
>
>
> > On 12/7/06, *Kurt Conrad* <conrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:conrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> >
> > Peter,
> >
> > The phrase "regular weekly conference call" is breaking down,
> given
> > the increasing number of events. Would it make sense to
> refer to the
> > calls like we had today as something like "periodic planning and
> > review sessions". I don't really like the word "periodic"
> but they
> > are not regularly scheduled and are fit in as time is available.
> >
> > This would also allow us to show the next planning session on our
> > schedule, to reinforce the topics which need to be addressed
> in the
> > current session.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > /s/ kwc 2006.12.07 11:40
>
>
> > At 2006-12-07 08:43, you wrote:
> > >1. We don't have an event today, but the regular weekly
> > >conference call for active members will still be on. We
> > >won't have a heavy agenda today (as some of those who
> > >would usually show up are traveling), and the call will
> > >probably be less than 1 hour. Besides the usual
> > >sync-up, we could spend some time on looking back at
> > >2006, and discussion on what else would be interesting
> > >to do in 2007. I would also encourage new members to
> > >join us at the call, just to say 'hello' and to get a
> > >feel for the 'virtual meeting' setting. Please refer to
> > >details at:
> >
> >
> ___________________________________________________________________
> > Kurt Conrad
>_________________________________________________________________
>To Post: mailto:ontolog-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-admin/
>Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
>Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (06)
___________________________________________________________________
Kurt Conrad
588 Bancroft St.
Santa Clara, CA 95051-5612
(408) 247-0454
mailto:conrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.SagebrushGroup.com (07)
_________________________________________________________________
To Post: mailto:ontolog-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-admin/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (08)
|