That's fine with me, Peter, (01)
I asked because this summary has already been requested a couple of times. (02)
Regards,
Rex (03)
At 9:02 AM -0700 8/18/05, Peter P. Yim wrote:
> > [RexB] I also have a question for you and Peter, whom I am
>> copying, could I shop this to media, for no remuneration?
>
>[ppy] my take: as far as Ontolog is concerned, its IPR policy (ref:
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid32) should
>rule.
>
>That said, I personally do want to see that community members do end
>up 'gaining (both intellectually, opportunistically, commercially,
>financially, ...) from their engagement with this CoP -- I trust
>that (to provide continuous value to its constituency) being the
>only way the CoP can be sustainable.
>
>That said, may I suggest that we have (a) an open, community
>sanctioned summary report of the 8/25 session that will be published
>by Ontolog, goes into its archives, gets used as the community
>submission to the Fed HIT Conference, ...etc. But then, since
>authors actually hold the copyrights (not Ontolog ... Ontolog just
>stipulates that they should carry an open content license), you guys
>could re-factor that and shop it elsewhere (gratis, or for
>remuneration, as you see fit) as long as proper attributed is made
>(to Ontolog and the other contributors, namely Ontolog, the
>panelists, and those participating in the discussion and discourse.)
>
>How does that sound?
>[Maybe we should bounce this off each other a bit, and then find a
>way to post this (in its reiterated form) to the forum as a
>guideline for future community work products.]
>
>Cheers. =ppy
>
>P.S. I'm routing this thread also to Leo (co-convener), Bob
>(planning team) and [ontolog-admin] (open archive) to solicit
>further comments and a record of this very useful dialog. =ppy
>--
>
>
>Rex Brooks wrote Thu, 18 Aug 2005 08:04:54 -0700:
>>Hi Kurt,
>>
>>I wanted to take advantage of this brief window between meetings of
>>TCs which are finali zing specifications for public review to ask
>>if you would be so kind as to take on the task of writing and/or
>>editing a Summary Report of the Health Informatics Panel Discussion
>>I am moderating on Aug. 25, 2005?
>>
>>I understand that you are the chief Ontolog scribe, so to speak, or
>>historian, or perhaps managing editor might be the more accurate
>>term. Regardless, the job of preparing and moderating is more than
>>sufficient for my needs (small joke), This is especially so since I
>>am on the spot to produce a pilot that is taking its not-so-merry
>>time getting to the point where I can actually start useful work,
>>with less than a month, or perhaps a bit more if it misses its
>>first target date of Sept. 14, and slips to Sept. 23.
>>
>>So, if you can do that, I would greatly appreciate it.
>>
>>I also have a question for you and Peter, whom I am copying, could
>>I shop this to media, for no remuneration?
>>
>>I would like to get some publicity for these issues and I
>>specifically am thinking about Federal Computer Week and Washington
>>Technology.
>>
>>Ciao,
>>Rex (04)
--
Rex Brooks
President, CEO
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-849-2309
_________________________________________________________________
To Post: mailto:ontolog-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-admin/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (05)
|