Hi, (01)
Peter, thanks for verbalizing the IP Chain issue in a context of many
continuing versions of these concepts. (02)
Cheers, (03)
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter P. Yim [mailto:peter.yim@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 9:02 AM
To: Rex Brooks; conrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: [ontolog-admin]; Leo Obrst; Bob Smith
Subject: Re: Writing/Editing the Summary Report of the Aug. 25, Health
Informatics Panel Discussion (04)
> [RexB] I also have a question for you and Peter, whom I am > copying,
could I shop this to media, for no remuneration? (05)
[ppy] my take: as far as Ontolog is concerned, its IPR policy
(ref: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid32)
should rule. (06)
That said, I personally do want to see that community members do end up
'gaining (both intellectually, opportunistically, commercially, financially,
...) from their engagement with this CoP -- I trust that (to provide
continuous value to its
constituency) being the only way the CoP can be sustainable. (07)
That said, may I suggest that we have (a) an open, community sanctioned
summary report of the 8/25 session that will be published by Ontolog, goes
into its archives, gets used as the community submission to the Fed HIT
Conference, ...etc. But then, since authors actually hold the copyrights
(not Ontolog ...
Ontolog just stipulates that they should carry an open content license), you
guys could re-factor that and shop it elsewhere (gratis, or for
remuneration, as you see fit) as long as proper attributed is made (to
Ontolog and the other contributors, namely Ontolog, the panelists, and those
participating in the discussion and discourse.) (08)
How does that sound?
[Maybe we should bounce this off each other a bit, and then find a way to
post this (in its reiterated form) to the forum as a guideline for future
community work products.] (09)
Cheers. =ppy (010)
P.S. I'm routing this thread also to Leo (co-convener), Bob (planning team)
and [ontolog-admin] (open archive) to solicit further comments and a record
of this very useful dialog. =ppy
-- (011)
Rex Brooks wrote Thu, 18 Aug 2005 08:04:54 -0700:
> Hi Kurt,
>
> I wanted to take advantage of this brief window between meetings of
> TCs which are finali zing specifications for public review to ask if
> you would be so kind as to take on the task of writing and/or editing
> a Summary Report of the Health Informatics Panel Discussion I am
> moderating on Aug. 25, 2005?
>
> I understand that you are the chief Ontolog scribe, so to speak, or
> historian, or perhaps managing editor might be the more accurate term.
> Regardless, the job of preparing and moderating is more than
> sufficient for my needs (small joke), This is especially so since I am
> on the spot to produce a pilot that is taking its not-so-merry time
> getting to the point where I can actually start useful work, with less
> than a month, or perhaps a bit more if it misses its first target date
> of Sept. 14, and slips to Sept. 23.
>
> So, if you can do that, I would greatly appreciate it.
>
> I also have a question for you and Peter, whom I am copying, could I
> shop this to media, for no remuneration?
>
> I would like to get some publicity for these issues and I specifically
> am thinking about Federal Computer Week and Washington Technology.
>
> Ciao,
> Rex (012)
_________________________________________________________________
To Post: mailto:ontolog-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-admin/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (013)
|