Steve, (01)
Thank you very much for the prompt response. (02)
> I thought I had sent that to you back in December ... (03)
You probably had, and I apologize. It could have been lost through the
chaotic mess of spam and spam filters that your messages had to fight
to get through. (04)
> I can participate in your 2/12 call (05)
This is most wonderful. On behalf of the forum, may I thank you
sincerely, for taking your time. (06)
> I guess the Ontolog Wiki pages are the best resource to educate
> myself further on your context? (07)
Yes. That, and possibly the message archive too. One convenient (and
easy to remember) on ramp to the ontolog space would be
http://ontolog.cim3.net (08)
In fact, Leo Obrst just gave a presentation this morning, at our
regular conference call. You might take a look at the relevant message
thread at
http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum//ontolog-forum/2004-01/msg00050.html (or
the wiki page at
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Conference_Call_2004-01-15 )
to get a feel for how we process that. Figuring about 45 minutes for
the talk, and then another 20-30 minutes for Q&A and discussions would
be appropriate. (09)
Of course, we are open to suggestions all the time. Let us know how
you would want to do it. (010)
Would you be kind enough to send me: (011)
(a) A title for your talk, and (012)
(b) A short bio of yourself, to allow me to properly introduce you to
the community. (013)
I'd need the above at your earliest convenience. And then, closer to
the time, we would also need, (014)
(c) an electronic version of your presentation, plus whatever other
material (references, links, etc.) you may want to disseminate. (015)
Furthermore, you are most welcomed to add-to/modify the wiki page that
features your presentation too, once that is up (say, about a week or
two before the event). (016)
Let me know, anytime, if you have any question. (017)
Thanks & regards,
PPY
-- (018)
Steve Ray wrote Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:46:39 -0500:
>
> Peter,
> I think I can participate in your 2/12 call. I thought I had sent
> that to you back in December, but maybe my mind is going...
> I guess the Ontolog Wiki pages are the best resource to educate
> myself further on your context?
>
> - Steve (019)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Yim [mailto:peter.yim@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 5:52 PM
> To: Steve Ray
> Subject: Re: Invitation to speak at an ontolog-forum conference call
>
>
> Hello Steve,
>
> Happy New Year!
>
> I should have followed-up with you on the subject matter, which was
> recapped in an earlier message (below) after our phone conversation.
> It's likely that the message never reached you.
>
> Please review and advise what would be a good day for you to speak to
> our forum.
>
> Al Jones may already have told you that (i) I am working on a pilot
> CWE (collaborative work environment) called <interop> for NIST/MSID,
> which I plan to deliver this week; (ii) that I will be in the
> Washington DC area later this month, and (iii) would hope to some time
> (1/28 possibly) at NIST to go through the deployment, use, and
> administration aspects of the <interop> CWE.
>
> And, of course, I shall look forward to meeting you again.
>
> Best regards,
> PPY
> -- (020)
> Peter Yim wrote Mon, 15 Dec 2003 20:16:07 -0800:
>
>>Hello Steve,
>>
>>Further to our telephone conversation this afternoon, I have the
>>pleasure in inviting you to speak to us during one of our regular
>>ontolog-forum weekly conference calls in the near future. Our calls are
>>generally scheduled to be held on Thursdays, 1:30pm to 3:00pm Eastern
>
> Time.
>
>>As mentioned, I am looking towards bringing some of our activities to
>>more closely align with pertinent government strategies and initiatives;
>>and to foster working relationships with government groups that are
>>working on the similar topic areas. Your talking to the group and
>>affording us a chance to have an open dialog would be most helpful
>>towards that end.
>>
>>If you could pick one or two dates that you could be available in
>>February 2004 (any of the Thursdays: 2/5, 12, 19 or 26), I could quickly
>>circulate it among our core members (to make sure we don't run into
>>unforeseen schedule conflicts), and then get back to you to confirm the
>>date.
>>
>>Thank you very much for agreeing to speak. I shall look forward to the
>>event, and to collaborating with NIST.
>>
>>Sincerely,
>>PPY (021)
_________________________________________________________________
To Post: mailto:ontolog-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-admin/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (022)
|