ontolog-admin
[Top] [All Lists]

[ontolog-admin] Re: Invitation to speak at an ontolog-forum conference

To: ray@xxxxxxxx
Cc: ontolog-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:54:25 -0800
Message-id: <400ECAE1.5060108@xxxxxxxx>
Steve,    (01)

Thank you very much for the input.    (02)

I've initialized the wiki page relating to your talk. See it at:
  http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2004_02_12    (03)

Kurt Conrad will be announcing this to the forum shortly.    (04)

On behalf of the [ontolog] community, may I thank you, and let you 
know that we are looking forward to your Feb. 12, 2004 presentation.    (05)

Best regards,
PPY
--    (06)

Steve Ray wrote Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:16:39 -0500:
> Peter,
>       How about the following title: "NIST's Semantic Approach to
> Standards and Interoperability"
> 
> I'm attaching a bio, and will have electronic slides for you in early
> February.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> - Steve    (07)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Yim [mailto:peter.yim@xxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 6:05 PM
> To: Steve Ray
> Cc: ontolog-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Invitation to speak at an ontolog-forum conference call
> 
> 
> Steve,
> 
> Thank you very much for the prompt response.
> 
>  > I thought I had sent that to you back in December ...
> 
> You probably had, and I apologize. It could have been lost through the 
> chaotic mess of spam and spam filters that your messages had to fight 
> to get through.
> 
>  > I can participate in your 2/12 call
> 
> This is most wonderful.  On behalf of the forum, may I thank you 
> sincerely, for taking your time.
> 
>  > I guess the Ontolog Wiki pages are the best resource to educate  > myself
> further on your context?
> 
> Yes. That, and possibly the message archive too. One convenient (and 
> easy to remember) on ramp to the ontolog space would be 
> http://ontolog.cim3.net
> 
> In fact, Leo Obrst just gave a presentation this morning, at our 
> regular conference call. You might take a look at the relevant message 
> thread at 
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum//ontolog-forum/2004-01/msg00050.html (or 
> the wiki page at 
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Conference_Call_2004-01-15 ) 
> to get a feel for how we process that. Figuring about 45 minutes for 
> the talk, and then another 20-30 minutes for Q&A and discussions would 
> be appropriate.
> 
> Of course, we are open to suggestions all the time. Let us know how 
> you would want to do it.
> 
> Would you be kind enough to send me:
> 
> (a) A title for your talk, and
> 
> (b) A short bio of yourself, to allow me to properly introduce you to 
> the community.
> 
> I'd need the above at your earliest convenience. And then, closer to 
> the time, we would also need,
> 
> (c) an electronic version of your presentation, plus whatever other 
> material (references, links, etc.) you may want to disseminate.
> 
> Furthermore, you are most welcomed to add-to/modify the wiki page that 
> features your presentation too, once that is up (say, about a week or 
> two before the event).
> 
> Let me know, anytime, if you have any question.
> 
> Thanks & regards,
> PPY
> --    (08)

> Steve Ray wrote Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:46:39 -0500:
>  >
> 
>>Peter,
>>      I think I can participate in your 2/12 call. I thought I had sent 
>>that to you back in December, but maybe my mind is going...
>>      I guess the Ontolog Wiki pages are the best resource to educate 
>>myself further on your context?
>>
>>- Steve    (09)


>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Peter Yim [mailto:peter.yim@xxxxxxxx]
>>Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 5:52 PM
>>To: Steve Ray
>>Subject: Re: Invitation to speak at an ontolog-forum conference call
>>
>>
>>Hello Steve,
>>
>>Happy New Year!
>>
>>I should have followed-up with you on the subject matter, which was
>>recapped in an earlier message (below) after our phone conversation. 
>>It's likely that the message never reached you.
>>
>>Please review and advise what would be a good day for you to speak to
>>our forum.
>>
>>Al Jones may already have told you that (i) I am working on a pilot
>>CWE (collaborative work environment) called <interop> for NIST/MSID, 
>>which I plan to deliver this week; (ii) that I will be in the 
>>Washington DC area later this month, and (iii) would hope to some time 
>>(1/28 possibly) at NIST to go through the deployment, use, and 
>>administration aspects of the <interop> CWE.
>>
>>And, of course, I shall look forward to meeting you again.
>>
>>Best regards,
>>PPY
>>--    (010)


>>Peter Yim wrote Mon, 15 Dec 2003 20:16:07 -0800:
>>
>>
>>>Hello Steve,
>>>
>>>Further to our telephone conversation this afternoon, I have the 
>>>pleasure in inviting you to speak to us during one of our regular 
>>>ontolog-forum weekly conference calls in the near future. Our calls 
>>>are generally scheduled to be held on Thursdays, 1:30pm to 3:00pm 
>>>Eastern
>>
>>Time.
>>
>>
>>>As mentioned, I am looking towards bringing some of our activities to 
>>>more closely align with pertinent government strategies and 
>>>initiatives; and to foster working relationships with government 
>>>groups that are working on the similar topic areas. Your talking to 
>>>the group and affording us a chance to have an open dialog would be 
>>>most helpful towards that end.
>>>
>>>If you could pick one or two dates that you could be available in 
>>>February 2004 (any of the Thursdays: 2/5, 12, 19 or 26), I could 
>>>quickly circulate it among our core members (to make sure we don't run 
>>>into unforeseen schedule conflicts), and then get back to you to 
>>>confirm the date.
>>>
>>>Thank you very much for agreeing to speak. I shall look forward to the 
>>>event, and to collaborating with NIST.
>>>
>>>Sincerely,
>>>PPY
--    (011)

_________________________________________________________________
To Post: mailto:ontolog-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-admin/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/  
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/    (012)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>