ontolog-admin
[Top] [All Lists]

[ontolog-admin] Re: ontology discussion

To: Kenneth Fields <ken@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: ontolog-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "Peter P. Yim" <yimpp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 08:40:59 -0700
Message-id: <3F37B90B.1080100@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Hello Professor Fields,    (01)

Thank you very much for your compliment.    (02)

For upper ontology, I understand that the IEEE Standard Upper Ontology 
(SUO) Working Group does run a few discussion lists (see: 
http://purpleslurple.cim3.org/ps.php?theurl=http://suo.ieee.org/#purp74 
).    (03)

I saw your post to [protege-discussion]. That's a good place to hang 
out too. While it is tools-centric, there are participants from many 
different domains there, and they are generally friendly and helpful.    (04)

Yes, the [ontolog-forum] is business focused. Our charter can be found 
at: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl#nid011    (05)

Your suggestion of    (06)

 > An ontology discussion web discussion might include the local
 > discussion and up (the onto tree) while having ways of
 > discovering other ontology discussions which may be unrelated
 > but contain links to your area - so that you may offer expert
 > advice.    (07)

is ideal ... I am not familiar with any existing active forum that 
covers such a scope. By copying my co-conveners of [ontolog] here, 
let's see if they might know of something.    (08)

Of course, you are most welcomed to subscribe to the [ontolog-forum] 
either as an active participant or as an observer. Our invitation (at: 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/2002-09/msg00000.html ) is 
standing.    (09)

Good luck to your endeavor.    (010)

Best regards,
PPY    (011)

P.S. On a separate note, I run CIM3.NET, which is in the business of 
providing infrastructure and support for coomunities of practice and 
distributed project teams. You can see our infrstructure and tools at 
work in the context of [ontolog-forum]. If you are starting your own 
community, you might consider using our platform. That way, your can 
focus on your goals and your prjects, without having to worry too much 
about the infrastructure and support issues. If you are interested, 
please take a look at http://www.cim3.com/CIM3_Executive_Brief.htm ; 
and if that's something you want to do, please feel free to email me 
any time. Tx. -ppy
--     (012)


Kenneth Fields wrote Sat, 9 Aug 2003 15:19:11 +0800:    (013)

> hi,
> I'm just wondering about your forum. It is organized so well.
> I'm am looking for a general place for ontology discussion which
> breaks down into more specialized areas/communities. I am
> interested in the discussion of upper areas of the ontology, but
> need conversation in developing my own ontology in digital arts.
> An ontology discussion web discussion might include the local
> discussion and up (the onto tree) while having ways of
> discovering other ontology discussions which may be unrelated
> but contain links to your area - so that you may offer expert
> advice.
> 
> Is your group open to these discussions, or are you business
> focussed. if business, than might you refer me to an ontology
> discussion site before I go and reinvent (install) the wheel.
> 
> 
> Dr. Kenneth Fields
> Professor Media Arts/Computer Music
> CEMC - China Center for Electronic Music
> Central Conservatory of Music
> 43 BaoJia Street
> XiCheng District
> Beijing, China, 100031
> 
>     (014)

_________________________________________________________________
To Post: mailto:ontolog-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-admin/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/  
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/    (015)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>