[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [EarthScienceOntolog] Session topics and co-chairs for each

To: EarthScienceOntolog Mini-series Planning <mini-series-org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 17:22:21 -0700
Message-id: <CAGdcwD1cU5AicKKiLeLJkFhsKB+13DqPxAR_0AJ2qgEzgr=NpQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Gary, Krzysztof and All,    (01)

Let's coordinate this, and if necessary, tweak the overall program
(which flow real well now)  - ref.
- when we confer in real time next week.    (02)

ALL: pleasd respond to the doodle poll - at: - if you haven't had a chance
to do so yet.    (03)

Regards. =ppy
--    (04)

On Jul 27, 2012 4:43 PM, "Krzysztof Janowicz" <jano@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> No problem, we can be third.
> On 07/27/2012 03:49 PM, Gary Berg-Cross wrote:
> Krzysztof et al,
> You will notice on our site that Naicong and I have been organizing for the 
>2nd session. 
> It is called "Ontology development and applicaiton across Earth Science 
> We too have a general topic that might logically follow a Value Prop (but 
>also Requirements) 1st session.
> More info on this next week.
> Gary    (05)

> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Krzysztof Janowicz <jano@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
>> Hi Peter, all,
>> I also talked to Pascal about this and he would be interested in 
>co-organizing the interoperability and heterogeneity session with me. From my 
>understanding, the first session on the value proposition is the most basic 
>and overview-like. Hence, the interoperability session could be second as it 
>is one of the central value propositions of geospatial semantics. Personally, 
>I would propose to keep the mini series small at first and maybe restrict it 
>to just 3-4 sessions. If there is enough interest, we can still add more. I am 
>also not sure about the future of the EarthCube semantics community.
>> Best,
>> Krzysztof    (06)

>> On 07/19/2012 02:52 PM, Peter Yim wrote:
>> That sounds great, Krzysztof ... would you consider fitting that content 
>into the program framework as we have it so far (ref my earlier msg today on 
>this thread), or tweaking that framework to allow a better fit?
>> Regards. =ppy
>> --    (07)

>> On Jul 19, 2012 1:52 PM, "Krzysztof Janowicz" <jano@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>> if this would be interesting, I could organize a session on semantic
>>> interoperability and semantic heterogeneity.
>>> Best,
>>> Jano    (08)

Message Archives:  
Community Wiki:
Project homepage:    (09)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>