Re: [iaoa-education] Open Discussion

[Fabian Neuhaus <fneuhaus@xxxxxxxx>]

       The second is the degree of completeness of the list.
       As I've noted on the current wiki page there are terms
       whose interpretation and domain is fairly well fixed
       (e.g., OWL) and shouldn't concern us at this beginning
       phase. Whether there should be a 'complete' list or the
       completeness of the list is something all IAOA members
       should agree on.

I don't understand the argument. Why would you want to exclude a term just because its  interpretation is well understood or its interpretation is fixed? In my opinion the inclusion criterion should be: Is the term part of the core terminology of applied ontology? If the answer is "yes", the term should be included. And in my opinion OWL meets that criterion. 

Fabian 

_____________________________________________________________________ 
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/iaoa-education/   
Committee File-share: http://iaoa.cim3.net/file/work/Committee/Education/ 
Committee Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?IaoaEducation
Activities Blog: http://iaoa-activities.blogspot.com/ ...(coming!)
To join: please email committee chair or to: info @ iaoa.org 
IAOA website: http://iaoa.org    (01)