Re: [bsp-forum] Mission Statement

["Bob Smith" <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Deborah,

 

Do you think the term “related service” provides us with opportunity to address scope while retaining focus on Service (as opposed to Systems)?

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

 

---

From: bsp-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bsp-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Deborah MacPherson
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 9:52 AM
To: BSP Forum
Subject: [bsp-forum] Mission Statement

 

""Building Service Performance" is an Ontolog project to formalize how we describe any related service for the built environment."

I don't like the word "any" because its too broad. Is the following acceptable:

""Building Service Performance" is an Ontolog project to formalize descriptions and metrics for the built environment."

--
*************************************************
Deborah L. MacPherson CSI CCS, AIA
Projects Director, Accuracy&Aesthetics
Specifier, WDG Architecture PLLC

**************************************************

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/bsp-forum/   
Subscribe: mailto:bsp-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/bsp-forum/  
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/BSP/ 
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?BuildingServicePerformance    (01)