Hi Deborah
Sounds like you have a good start on this
next step: Finding out what we could do towards our mission, and seeing what
roles need to be performed.
The two SMARTCode PPT compare before and
after performances and the standards (Code templates?) appear worth discussing
in context of larger inclusive standards.
You had mentioned your need to work
further on right and left columns, and so link together more service functionality.
A telephone conference call within the
next week or so might be productive in extending our Mission to some target workplan on Building
Service Performance.
Cheers,
Bob
From: bsp-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bsp-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Deborah MacPherson
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008
10:07 AM
To: BSP Forum
Subject: [bsp-forum] SMARTcodes
Hi -
What are the next steps?
I've been talking with some people at the International Code Council that may
have an excellent perspective to add. Please see more about SMARTcodes here http://www.iccsafe.org/SMARTcodes/
Are the goals stated there (FAQ for example) in line with ideas or interests
outside of NBIMS?
Thank you,
Deborah
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Rex Brooks <rexb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Deborah,
Building Service Performance
The key concept was, I believe the need to
"better define the interface between control
systems and the outside
world."
Cheers,
Deborah L. MacPherson
Projects Director, Accuracy&Aesthetics
Specifier, WDG Architecture PLLC