Re: [uos-convene] "common" upper ontology?

["John A. Bateman" <bateman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

MikeU:    (01)

> (2) Each of the existing upper ontologies differs in specifics of
> implementation, but we all agree that use of A SMALL NUMBER OF formally
> defined AND INTERRELATED common upper ontologies is the most
> cost-effective method for achieving scalable semantic interoperability."    (02)

YES!
John B.
 _________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uos-convene/
To Post: mailto:uos-convene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UpperOntologySummit/uos-convene/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UpperOntologySummit    (03)