Maria, (01)
Got it! (I have now removed NSF from the candidate 'co-sponsor'
list already.) Thank you for the trying nonetheless. (02)
Cheers. =ppy (03)
P.S. Yes ... it's a bit time consuming keeping track with the
dialog, coming in from the middle of that discussion. We'll look
forward to working with you at the face-to-face meetings next
week, Maria.
-- (04)
Zemankova, Maria wrote Mon, 6 Mar 2006 09:53:39 -0500:
> Peter,
>
> As I originally stated for the original and current definition of
>"co-sponsor", NSF cannot be included.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Maria
>
> P.S. The emails from [uos-convene] are too much for me to keep up with, I am
>only reading yours. (05)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: uos-convene-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:uos-convene-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Peter P. Yim
> Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 7:20 PM
> To: Upper Ontology Summit convention
> Subject: Definition of 'co-sponsor' [was-Re: [uos-convene] UOS
> co-sponsorship - NEED ANSWER]
>
>
> Thank you all for spending time to discuss this.
>
> Unfortunately, this is not the type of issue we can settle by
> voting. ... especially not now, after our solicitation has gone
> out and some organizations (like UBL, and even NSF, from Maria's
> earlier message which I find to be extremely encouraging) are
> still working on getting their 'co-sponsorship' confirmed for us.
>
> ...[snip]...
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uos-convene/
To Post: mailto:uos-convene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UpperOntologySummit/uos-convene/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UpperOntologySummit (06)
|