Hi Todd, (01)
OK. Maybe we're moving toward a consensus then. However, yesterday I
think Ken mentioned that the OOR implementation was meant to be
demonstrative and not intended for production as you suggest. I could
have misinterpreted what Ken was saying though. This could have a
significant impact on the implementation. Maybe we could clarify this
point. (02)
Thanks,
Cameron. (03)
Sent from my iPhone (04)
On Sep 18, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Todd J Schneider
<todd.schneider@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: (05)
> Cameron,
>
> For my understanding, yes. Both a specification and a reference
> implementation (for use as a production system).
>
> Todd
>
>
>
> From:
> Cameron Ross <cross@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To:
> OpenOntologyRepository-discussion <oor-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:
> 09/18/2010 08:42 AM
> Subject:
> [oor-forum] OOR Deloverable
> Sent by:
> oor-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Is the primary deliverable from ONTOLOG's work on OOR to be a
> specification, an implementation, or both?
>
> Cameron
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
> Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
> Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository
>
> (06)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository (07)
|