Cameron, (01)
Ken did (in answering my question) clarify what he actually meant ...
(I have yet to post the edited chat-transcript - I'll make up the link
to this reference later), but, for now, take a look at the last 3
lines of the unedited chat-transcript at:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OpenOntologyRepository/2010-09-17_OOR-Dev-Take-4/chat-transcript_20100917b_unedited.txt (02)
Regards. =ppy
-- (03)
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Cameron Ross <cross@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Todd,
>
> OK. Maybe we're moving toward a consensus then. However, yesterday I
> think Ken mentioned that the OOR implementation was meant to be
> demonstrative and not intended for production as you suggest. I could
> have misinterpreted what Ken was saying though. This could have a
> significant impact on the implementation. Maybe we could clarify this
> point.
>
> Thanks,
> Cameron.
>
> Sent from my iPhone (04)
> On Sep 18, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Todd J Schneider
> <todd.schneider@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Cameron,
>>
>> For my understanding, yes. Both a specification and a reference
>> implementation (for use as a production system).
>>
>> Todd (05)
>> From:
>> Cameron Ross <cross@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To:
>> OpenOntologyRepository-discussion <oor-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date:
>> 09/18/2010 08:42 AM
>> Subject:
>> [oor-forum] OOR Deloverable
>> Sent by:
>> oor-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>> Is the primary deliverable from ONTOLOG's work on OOR to be a
>> specification, an implementation, or both?
>>
>> Cameron
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone (06)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository (07)
|