ERRATA - (with thanks to JohnGraybeal for help catching the errors) (01)
In all my haste last Thursday (trying to get ready for the
OntologySummit2008 launch event) I made a total mess toward the end of
the message below (timestamped: Feb 7, 2008 7:58 AM PST). Therefore,
please ignore the second half of that message and read the following
instead ... (02)
//
Now that we have put this exercise behind us, let us go ahead and do
some *real* work. In particular: (03)
1. we are still looking for people to tell us what they can/will bring
to the table on this initiative. Please enter them into the wiki page
at: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OOR/ActiveMemberContribution (04)
[... no update.] (05)
2. Besides studying some very well thought through inputs (say, from
Farrukh, Leo, etc.), we still need your input into a few key areas -
see: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/2008-01/msg00041.html (06)
[... a wrong link was supplied in my original post.] (07)
3. do note that our next call is scheduled for Wed 2008.02.13 - 1.5
Hr. starting at: 12:00pm EST / 9:00am PST / 17:00 GMT/UTC. Please mark your
calendars now and refer to details at the wiki session page (closer to
the time) at:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OOR/ConferenceCall_2008_02_13
( ... I am still waiting for RSVP's) (08)
[... the date was correct on my post, but the time was wrong. Please
use the time shown above, or the ones posted in the wiki session
page.] (09)
4. The OntologySummit2008 Launch Event is coming up in about an
hour-and-a-half (from now). Since it was this team that originally
proposed the main theme for this year's Summit, I hope everyone can be
there at the Launch and voice how they want the Summit to proceed. See
you there shortly!
Details at: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2008_02_07 (010)
[... this, of course, has come and gone. Full proceedings of the
session can be found at the session page cited above now.] (011)
// (012)
With my apologies. =ppy
-- (013)
On Feb 7, 2008 7:58 AM, Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ALL,
>
>
> Thanks to all who voted.
>
> We have successfully adopted (A) as the definition of "ontology
> repository" for the OOR initiative:
>
> "An ontology repository is a facility where ontologies and related
> information artifacts can be stored, retrieved and managed."
>
> After 85 email exchanges, I think as a team, we are much clearer on
> where this group stands in terms of a definition for "ontology
> repository." While we had 12 votes for (A), 2 for (B) and 2
> abstentions (and even 2 people unsubscribing from the list during the
> process, whether or not that is related), the consensus is that the
> above is "good enough" a working definition for this team to move on
> (to do more serious things, like accomplishing our mission), and we
> could always come back and revisit this later, if need be.
>
> While the process was a bit tedious, I think it brought out some of
> the best in us as a team -- the collective passion, knowledge,
> civility, collaborative-attitude, etc. ... those were just astounding.
> I think this *really* bodes well for the team and the mission ahead of
> us.
>
> Now that we have put this exercise behind us, let us go ahead and do
> some *real* work. ... [see above for corrected version of text that is
>supposed to follow.] (014)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository (015)
|