[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [oor-forum] Motion to skip formal definition of Ontology Repository

To: OpenOntologyRepository-discussion <oor-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Farrukh Najmi <farrukh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:43:59 -0500
Message-id: <47A7871F.1010806@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Duane Nickull wrote:
> Yeah - this works too.  There are plenty of industry definitions.
> Farrukh - where is the ebXML definitions?  I really liked those.
>       (01)

I can't recall where those are.    (02)

Here are some that are close to my own definition:    (03)

Registry: "a central location in an organization where metadata 
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metadata> definitions are stored and 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metadata_registry    (04)

Repository: "a place where data <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data> are 
stored and maintained"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repository    (05)

Here is a good differentiation betwen the two:    (06)

http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/wiki/Overview#The_Role_of_the_Registry    (07)

HTH.    (08)

> Duane
> On 2/4/08 10:47 AM, "Farrukh Najmi" <farrukh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> At the risk of repeating my past post on this, I feel this discussion
>> and splitting of hairs on Registry / Repository terms to be quite
>> unnecessary and waste of bandwidth.
>> We should just create a terminology wiki page and simply link these
>> terms to existing definitions for these terms elsewhere and then focus
>> on defining use cases and requirements.
>       (09)

Farrukh Najmi    (010)

Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com    (011)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/  
Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/  
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/ 
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository     (012)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>