Duane Nickull wrote:
> Yeah - this works too. There are plenty of industry definitions.
>
> Farrukh - where is the ebXML definitions? I really liked those.
> (01)
I can't recall where those are. (02)
Here are some that are close to my own definition: (03)
Registry: "a central location in an organization where metadata
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metadata> definitions are stored and
maintained"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metadata_registry (04)
Repository: "a place where data <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data> are
stored and maintained"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repository (05)
Here is a good differentiation betwen the two: (06)
<http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/wiki/Overview#The_Role_of_the_Repository>
http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/wiki/Overview#The_Role_of_the_Registry (07)
HTH. (08)
> Duane
>
>
> On 2/4/08 10:47 AM, "Farrukh Najmi" <farrukh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>> At the risk of repeating my past post on this, I feel this discussion
>> and splitting of hairs on Registry / Repository terms to be quite
>> unnecessary and waste of bandwidth.
>> We should just create a terminology wiki page and simply link these
>> terms to existing definitions for these terms elsewhere and then focus
>> on defining use cases and requirements.
>>
>
> (09)
--
Regards,
Farrukh Najmi (010)
Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com (011)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository (012)
|