[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [oor-forum] Motion to skip formal definition of Ontology Repository

To: OpenOntologyRepository-discussion <oor-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Duane Nickull <dnickull@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:08:25 -0800
Message-id: <C3CCA2A9.C2C7%dnickull@xxxxxxxxx>
Yeah - this works too.  There are plenty of industry definitions.    (01)

Farrukh - where is the ebXML definitions?  I really liked those.    (02)

Duane    (03)

On 2/4/08 10:47 AM, "Farrukh Najmi" <farrukh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:    (04)

> At the risk of repeating my past post on this, I feel this discussion
> and splitting of hairs on Registry / Repository terms to be quite
> unnecessary and waste of bandwidth.
> We should just create a terminology wiki page and simply link these
> terms to existing definitions for these terms elsewhere and then focus
> on defining use cases and requirements.    (05)

"Speaking only for myself"
Senior Technical Evangelist - Adobe Systems, Inc.
Blog - http://technoracle.blogspot.com
Community Music - http://www.mix2r.com
My Band - http://www.myspace.com/22ndcentury
Adobe MAX 2008 - http://technoracle.blogspot.com/2007/08/adobe-max-2008.html
**********************************************************************    (06)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/  
Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/  
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/ 
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository     (07)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>