Dear Colleagues, (01)
I realize that initial meetings need to formulate terms etc. but am concerned
that the we need to move beyond these soon in order to make progress. (02)
Perhaps it would be good in future meetings to give the meetings a more R&D
flavor rather than an academic flavor. This would mean focusing more on
Deliverables, ACTION ITEMS, Participants, Roles, Sponsors, dependencies,
status, issues etc. (03)
BTW we should consider wiki content to address each of above topics so we all
keep in sync with it and each other. (04)
Just a thought. Thanks. (05)
Peter Yim wrote:
> We had a very fruitful meeting today, thanks to all who were able to join us.
> For those who were able to call in, the proceedings are captured at
> the session page at:
> In particular, were made an attempt (and came close) to adopting a
> definition for "ontology repository" (possibly even "ontology
> registry"), but decided to put this up for asynchronous discussion
> deliberaition due to time constraints. (I'll start a thread on this in
> a moment.)
> Very encouraging is the fact that the NIST-Ontology-NCOR-...
> co-organized "OntologySummit2008" has adopted "Toward An Open Ontology
> Repository" as the main theme this year. We are looking forward to
> bootstrap from that initiative. Ideas as to how we could do it would
> be welcome.
> Our next call is scheduled for Wed 2008.02.13 - 1.5 Hr. starting at:
> 1pm PST / 4pm EST / 21:00 GMT/UTC.
> Please mark your calendars now and refer to details at the wiki
> session page (closer to the time) at:
> Look forward to having you all at the next meeting.
Farrukh Najmi (07)
Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com (08)
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository (09)