Dear Pavithra, I think you have nicely explained why there is a need to talk in terms of capabilities. I agree all the things you mention are also part of the mix, but capabilities gives you a way to bring it together. Regards Matthew West Information Junction Tel: +44 1489 880185 Mobile: +44 750 3385279 Skype: dr.matthew.west matthew.west@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.informationjunction.co.uk/ http://www.matthew-west.org.uk/ This email originates from Information Junction Ltd. Registered in England and Wales No. 6632177. Registered office: 2 Brookside, Meadow Way, Letchworth Garden City, Hertfordshire, SG6 3JE. From: ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pavithra Sent: 14 March 2013 19:44 To: Ontology Summit 2013 discussion Subject: Re: [ontology-summit] Thank you. Hello,
Thank you again. Regarding the discussion about "Capability", I would like to add my two sense to it here. A capability can be translated as a function or service that meets certain set of requirements as defined by stake holders/organization/interested parties . If it is accomplished or performed by an "actor" or another "system" it can be written as use case or multiple use cases. Scenarios can be used to handle multiple dimension of the capability. Even tho use cases look simplistic, they are not necessarily that simple, the scenarios can handle complexities to certain level.. Thanks, Pavithra |
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2013/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2013
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (01)
|