Re: [ontology-summit] {quality-methodology} Building Ontologies to Meet

["QUATTRI, Francesca [11901993r]" <francesca.quattri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hey Yuri,
why don't you shift the conversation to our blog as well?

http://iaoablog.blogspot.de/

Every blog author now should get his/her own login, so that posts are signed automatically (rather than 'posted by IAOA member').
The blog's entry will also appear under

http://iaoa.org/iaoablog.php

To All: Give it a try, won't you?

F.

---

From: ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of Yuriy Milov [ym@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 11:07 PM
To: Ontology Summit 2013 discussion
Subject: Re: [ontology-summit] {quality-methodology} Building Ontologies to Meet Evaluation Criteria

Sure Matthew,

After compilation all ontologies (and other computer programs) work the same way as automatons (similar as any supercomputer is similar to the Turing machine)

All automatons are divided in four classes (similar as numbers can be natural, rational irrational, transcendental)

That why we have to find a way to "calculate" a "Class of Ontology" - roghly saying, to know if it is primitive, chaotic, interesting, or universal (this is just to give the idea for now)

I think you are right that discussing of this topic is a little bit off the main stream of the Summit, so I'm not going to continue it here.

Thanks for the understanding

Yuri

On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Matthew West <dr.matthew.west@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Dear Yuri,

 

I’m sorry, but although this looks very interesting in its own right, I really don’t understand how this might relate to ontologies and specifically ontology development methodology. I think you either need to explain the relationship, or if you wish to continue the discussion, move it to the ontolog forum which is not as focussed as the Ontology Summit.

 

I want to say that all texts related to texts are related to math. And I suppose that the "quality" of any text from the math point of view should bring into consideration the complexity (chaos) theory. 

 

Today  an elementary cellular automaton is well known - see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_cellular_automaton

 

Some rules ("texts") can generate primitive "lines", some of them generates "chaos", some of them generates "chaotic regularity", but some rules is considered to be "universal" (the rule 110, for example)

 

My point is to see ontologies as "texts ruling texts" into the "Steven Wolfram's paradigm" and to split all ontologies for four classes as Steven Wolfram had done for the automatons

 

I am not sure how to do this and even if it's possible to do but why not to ask? :-)

 

Regards

 

Matthew West                           

Information  Junction

Tel: +44 1489 880185

Mobile: +44 750 3385279

Skype: dr.matthew.west

matthew.west@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

http://www.informationjunction.co.uk/

http://www.matthew-west.org.uk/

 

This email originates from Information Junction Ltd. Registered in England and Wales No. 6632177.

Registered office: 2 Brookside, Meadow Way, Letchworth Garden City, Hertfordshire, SG6 3JE.

 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2013/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2013
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/

       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Disclaimer:

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and notify the sender and the University immediately. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

The University specifically denies any responsibility for the accuracy or quality of information obtained through University E-mail Facilities. Any views and opinions expressed are only those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the University and the University accepts no liability whatsoever for any losses or damages incurred or caused to any party as a result of the use of such information.

_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/   
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2013/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2013  
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/     (01)