To: | ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
From: | Megan Katsumi <megan.katsumi@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:08:03 -0500 |
Message-id: | <CAMn_S8rR9fzj5mJDRNetjbwYOtr3no6iMfSm1322NZLMrX-LUQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Hi All, What does it mean for an ontology to "influence" behaviour? I was hoping to get some clarification on the following points: Part of the Mission Statement for Track B refers to behaviors that are "...controlled or influence by an ontology." "The ontology in question may be fully embedded/encapsulated within an entity or system,...." Exactly what is meant by this? Does this refer to a situation where the ontology, as a set of axioms, does not exist and is only implicitly represented (i.e. embedded) in the system? Or, does this refer to a situation where the ontology is
built into a system and not easily accessible for isolated evaluation? In the former case, do language-specific issues (e.g. FOL vs OWL) become irrelevant? Thanks, Megan Katsumi _________________________________________________________________ Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2013/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2013 Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (01) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [ontology-summit] Ontology Summit 2013: Launch Event - Thu 2013.01.17, and more ..., Peter Yim |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontology-summit] Track B Mission Statement -- Clarification, Todd J Schneider |
Previous by Thread: | [ontology-summit] Ontology Summit 2013: Launch Event - Thu 2013.01.17, and more ..., Peter Yim |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontology-summit] Track B Mission Statement -- Clarification, Todd J Schneider |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |