|To:||Ontology Summit 2013 discussion <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|From:||Amanda Vizedom <amanda.vizedom@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:20:10 -0500|
I do, in fact, understand use case to include the broader requirements like those you mention. That is, what some might call business requirements, and/or human systems requirements. IME, failure to consider the ontology requirements that derive from such broader factors usually leads to selection or development of ontologies that fail to be what's needed. Result: failure to meet project goals, sometimes followed by course correction, sometimes by project or program abandonment.
Point taken that this is not necessarily a widely accepted view. I think I will have to pony up a rough use case outline or two of the sort I mean.
On Dec 12, 2012 6:06 PM, "Fabian Neuhaus" <fneuhaus@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
_________________________________________________________________ Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2013/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2013 Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontology-summit] Potential Tracks for Ontology Summit 2013, Fabian Neuhaus|
|Next by Date:||Re: [ontology-summit] Visualization, Jack Ring|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [ontology-summit] Potential Tracks for Ontology Summit 2013, Fabian Neuhaus|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [ontology-summit] Potential Tracks for Ontology Summit 2013, Hans Polzer|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|