> [Pavithra] It is Peters role to mind this forum by the way.. (01)
[ppy] that is actually not true. (02)
Like the [ontolog-forum] list, community members are expected to use
their own best judgment and self-regulate, to keep us aligned with our
mission, keep it civil, maintain a high signal-to-noise ratio, and
make it an effective part of our collaborative work environment. (03)
Unlike the [ontolog-forum] list, though, this is (part of) the
OntologySummit2011 discussion platform, and track champions have been
identified to help facilitate the discourse. (04)
Thanks & regards. =ppy
-- (05)
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Pavithra <pavithra_kenjige@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Michael If your straw man thing did not include roles and responsibilities
>, probably it should.. It did say something about actors ,,, actors have
>roles ,,
> I found your models un necessarily complicated..
>
> It is Peters role to mind this forum by the way.. (06)
> --- On Fri, 3/11/11, Michael F Uschold <uschold@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Michael F Uschold <uschold@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [ontology-summit] Keep Message Subject Fresh and Relevant
> To: "Ontology Summit 2011 discussion" <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Friday, March 11, 2011, 12:58 PM
>
> Many threads go well off the main topic. Please remember to use the good
>practice of changing the subject when it changes from the original thread.
> Michael
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Pavithra <pavithra_kenjige@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The terminology and taxonomy and classifications are generally developed by
>subject matter expertise or along with SMEs.. ( Information providers and
>receivers ). These are part of Ontology in my opinion.. IT people do not
>develop these on their own, unless they are the SMEs. For example there are
>many MD, PhDs these days with double degree in medicine and technology or
>science, who wants to understand both the worlds. Then there people who like
>to collaborate rather than indulge in everything. There are many doctors who
>like to study certain areas of medicine and research and cure people rather
>than develop information architecture themselves.. It depends. ..
>
> Generally, CIO are responsible for processes, policy for information flow,
>storage, security and any management related issues for computerized
>information..
> CTOs are responsible for the technology stacks and policies and management of
>technology profile..
> Yet again roles and responsibilities are not set in stone, and are defined
>with in organization to meet its needs.
>
> --
> Michael Uschold, PhD
> Senior Ontology Consultant, Semantic Arts
> LinkedIn: http://tr.im/limfu
> Skype, Twitter: UscholdM (07)
> --- On Fri, 3/11/11, Jack Ring <jring7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Jack Ring <jring7@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [ontology-summit] [Ontology Application Framework] Revised
>Strawman Proposal
> To: "Ontology Summit 2011 discussion" <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Friday, March 11, 2011, 10:04 AM
>
> Ontology pushers would be much more popular if they understood that
>operational people negotiate the shared aspects of their respective ontologies
>every day.
> Acknowledging this will help us help them enlist the IT "machinery" in their
>task.
> Reminds me of the time not too long ago when the advent of Basic from
>Dartmouth expanded the market for computer usage ten fold. Today most
>ontologists are asking users to work at the mnemonic level. Waiting on the CIO
>is not a winning strategy. (08)
> On Mar 11, 2011, at 6:48 AM, Anders Tell wrote:
>
> > Shouldnt we show (teach) operational people the power of ontology so they
>can do their part? and not indicate that IT and engineers do it so much better?
> >
> > Maybe the terminological benefits that John S. are pointing out could be
>the base for a Business variant of big O? (09)
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (010)
|