|To:||Ontology Summit <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|From:||Michael F Uschold <uschold@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Thu, 3 Mar 2011 09:13:50 -0800|
There are two very different ways to write a communique.
1. summarize the results of our 5 tracks, tied together in some nice way
2. make the case for ontology
If the former, we can talk about case studies, and the application framework etc, and the makign the case part will be discussed in the strategy section.
If the latter, we make no attempt to summarize the tracks per se, we just take our best shot at making the caes for ontology, period. This is probably more useful, and we can point to output of each track, to the extent that they exist. This approach may also be much harder to organize, meaning and produce. Having each track lead produce a summary of their results is not really much more than solid background material for writing a document focused on making the case.
Michael Uschold, PhD
Senior Ontology Consultant, Semantic Arts
Skype, Twitter: UscholdM
_________________________________________________________________ Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011 Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontology-summit] [Ontology Summit] [Making the Case] Audiences, Jack Ring|
|Next by Date:||Re: [ontology-summit] An example of the worth of ontology development, Nicola Guarino|
|Previous by Thread:||[ontology-summit] [Ontology Summit] [Making the Case] Audiences, Matthew West|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [ontology-summit] Communique: makign the case, or summaizing our results?, Fabian Neuhaus|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|