Moving this conversation to a separate thread ... (01)
Congratulations, Brand, (02)
Pavithra and Brand ... please continue your conversation on this
thread (so I can use the other thread to track people's endorsements.) (03)
Regards. =pyp (04)
P.S. Pavithra and all, please note ... and try to couple threaded
mailing list conversations to the proper subject line and topic.
-- (05)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <pavithra_kenjige@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 6:20 AM
Subject: Re: [ontology-summit] One day left to endorse the Summit Communique
To: steve@xxxxxxxxxxx, Ontology Summit 2009
<ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Niemann.Brand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (06)
Brand, (07)
Are you proposing that OMB should maintain data.gov ? (08)
Not to confuse the issue or anything. But to provide more clarity:
- Depending on the methodology the artifacts that defines meta
model, conceptual information model, logical and physcial data model
can vary.
For example:
- When Object Oriented concepts are used, the artifacts are
Business Objects, High level Object Diagrams etc..
- In Structured approach, Business entities, High level ER ( for
logical ) diagrams are developed. (09)
Ontologies can be used to come up with a set of business Objects or
Business Entities.and the types and subtypes.. ( From an enterprise
perspective..) that defines the enterprise. (010)
But one has to take one approach or the other, to be consistent and
have usable and traceable models, otherwise one has to map the
artifacts from one methodology to the other and define the usage ! (011)
Anyone has any different throughts on this? (012)
Regards,
Pavithra Kenjige (013)
- In (014)
SOA addresses application architecture (015)
--- On Fri, 4/17/09, Niemann.Brand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<Niemann.Brand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: (016)
From: Niemann.Brand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <Niemann.Brand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ontology-summit] One day left to endorse the Summit Communique
To: steve@xxxxxxxxxxx, "Ontology Summit 2009" <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, April 17, 2009, 7:01 AM (017)
Steve, I endorse and wnat to point out that my proposed design and
implementation of the new data.gov was accepted by OMB and presented
at the ArchitecturePlus Seminar yesterday as outlined in the slides i
sent to the Ontology Forum recently that included mention of the
Summit Pilot Projects. Please see
http://federaldata.wik.is/@api/deki/files/59/=BrandNiemann04102009.ppt (018)
Best regards, Brand (019)
-----ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: ----- (020)
To: "'Ontology Summit 2009'" <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<ontology-summit-org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Steve Ray" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 04/16/2009 04:09PM
Subject: [ontology-summit] One day left to endorse the Summit Communique (021)
Dear Colleagues, (022)
I had previously sent out the invitation below for
endorsements to our Summit communiqué, but had not specifically
brought this up on the summit or summit-org lists. So here is a
last-minute reminder, if you’d like to be included on the endorsement
list. Many of you have already responded, in which case please just
delete this message. (023)
Best regards, (024)
Steven R. Ray
Chair, Ontology Summit 2009 (025)
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2009/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2009
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (026)
|